thank you very much for your feedback.
Do you think, it is possible to replace the ADCLK914 with the ADCLK944,
since the ADCLK914 isn't even listed anymore under the clock
I made PLL Module using ADF4350 and DAC Module using ADCLK914 and AD9739A.
Because PLL Module and DAC Module is so far way, I use ADCLK914 for clock restoration.
DAC Module is work. It is good.
Now, I will revision DAC Module to include ADF4350.
It is mandatory to drive the 9789 with 1.4Vpp, like from an ADCLK914.
I noticed that the pads of the mentioned components are already on the position of the narrow pads closer to the ADCLK914.
After I saw the schematic of the board, I noticed that the output clock of adf4350 is not connected to any ports. Does it mean…
Those are the two best parts for the lowest additive jitter contribution.
In terms of wiring, it is best practice to place the buffer as close as possible to the converter. The layout for the evaluation boards are available online for your…
I would suggest that you use two ADCLK914 parts instead of the ADCLK944. The swing is larger on the ADCLK914 than the ADCLK944. The ADCLK944 min swing of 1.2V meets the AD9739 min input swing requirement of 1.2V, but it leaves no room for PCB loss or…
Is their any frequency translation requirement or is the goal only to distribute a single frequency?
The only true CML clock buffer that we have is the ADCLK914. This is only a 1:1 buffer.
ADCLK914 datasheet and product info | Ultrafast, SiGe…