I have measured the output power from the RF8 port on an ADF4371 evaluation board. I'm planning on using an ADF4372 on a new design. In terms of output power, can I assume the performance on the RF8 port is the same between these two parts?
ADF4371
Recommended for New Designs
The ADF4371 allows implementation of fractional-N or Integer N phase-locked loop (PLL) frequency synthesizers when used with an external loop filter and...
Datasheet
ADF4371 on Analog.com
ADF4372
Recommended for New Designs
The ADF4372 allows implementation of fractional-N or integer-N phase-locked loop (PLL) frequency synthesizers when used with an external loop filter and...
Datasheet
ADF4372 on Analog.com
I have measured the output power from the RF8 port on an ADF4371 evaluation board. I'm planning on using an ADF4372 on a new design. In terms of output power, can I assume the performance on the RF8 port is the same between these two parts?
As a followup question: do you have s-parameters for th RF8P/RF8N ports? I'm reviewing using a balun and I would like to know what impedance to use. Can I use the pullup inductors and a balun at the same time?
As a followup question: do you have s-parameters for th RF8P/RF8N ports? I'm reviewing using a balun and I would like to know what impedance to use. Can I use the pullup inductors and a balun at the same time?
Hi,
RF8 output port of ADF4372 and ADF4371 provides same performance. You can safely change ADF4371 with ADF4372.
I don't have s-parameter measurement that I can provide. Most of the specs given in the datasheet is taken with a balun at the output (Marki BAL-0036). You can use pull-up inductors at the outputs and use AC coupling capacitors and combine outputs after AC coupling with a balun. I don't see any problem with that.
Regards,
Kudret