Post Go back to editing

AD8362 residual noise, ADC oversampling

Thread Summary

The user inquired about using the AD8362's output with a 10-bit ADC and oversampling to achieve 14-bit ENOB resolution. The intrinsic circuit noise after an RC LPF was questioned for its suitability as white noise. The final answer noted that the question was considered resolved, either offline or through a multi-part response. Accompanying answers clarified that for unmodulated carriers, the residual output noise is broadband white noise, but for modulated carriers, the noise is not white and may require additional filtering. The AD8362's transfer function ripple and temperature drift were also highlighted as potential limitations, suggesting the ADL5902 as a more stable alternative.
AI Generated Content

I plan to acquire AD8362's output with some 10bit ADC and using oversampling & decimation for 14bit ENOB resolution. The question is that the intrinsic circuit's noise (after some hardware RC LPF) would be suitable as "white noise", uncorrelated, in order to benefit the oversampling technique.

Thanks very much in advance for clarifications,

Parents
  • If you are measuring the power of a modulated carrier (e.g. QPSK, QAM64, FM, etc) then the spectrum of the carrier will effectively mix down to dc and will manifest itself as noise which has to be filtered. I'm not sure that you can consider this to be white noise.

    If you are measuring the power of an unmodulated carrier, then I think that it's fair to say that your residual output noise is broadband white noise.

    I'm not sure of the value of the filtering you are planning on doing. If you look at the Vout vs Pin transfer function of the AD8362, you can see that there is transfer function ripple and nonlinearitt that is of the order of 0.5 dB or about 30 mV. Also the device has temperature drift of the order of +/-1 dB (approx +/-60mV).  So unless you plan to operate over a very narrow temperature range and plan to calibrated out the transfer function ripple, I'm not sure that filtering for 14 bit resolution has value.

    Finally, ADL5902 is a newer better part than AD8362. Its temperature stability and transfer function ripple are much smaller than AD8362.

Reply
  • If you are measuring the power of a modulated carrier (e.g. QPSK, QAM64, FM, etc) then the spectrum of the carrier will effectively mix down to dc and will manifest itself as noise which has to be filtered. I'm not sure that you can consider this to be white noise.

    If you are measuring the power of an unmodulated carrier, then I think that it's fair to say that your residual output noise is broadband white noise.

    I'm not sure of the value of the filtering you are planning on doing. If you look at the Vout vs Pin transfer function of the AD8362, you can see that there is transfer function ripple and nonlinearitt that is of the order of 0.5 dB or about 30 mV. Also the device has temperature drift of the order of +/-1 dB (approx +/-60mV).  So unless you plan to operate over a very narrow temperature range and plan to calibrated out the transfer function ripple, I'm not sure that filtering for 14 bit resolution has value.

    Finally, ADL5902 is a newer better part than AD8362. Its temperature stability and transfer function ripple are much smaller than AD8362.

Children
No Data

Before You Switch


Switching languages will make ADI Explorer unavailable. Resume your session by switching back to English and reopening ADI Explorer.