| SLA Status | Assignee | Support Status |
|---|---|---|
| SLA Closed. Met after 47 hours |
zwang emrecangidik All mike.oshea |
Assigned |
ADF5901
Recommended for New Designs
The ADF5901 is a 24 GHz Tx monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) with an on-chip, 24 GHz VCO with PGA and dual Tx channels for radar systems....
Datasheet
ADF5901 on Analog.com
ADF5904
Recommended for New Designs
The ADF5904 is a 4-channel, 24 GHz, receiver downconverter.
Each channel contains a single-ended RF input with an on-chip
balun followed by a differential...
Datasheet
ADF5904 on Analog.com
ADF4159
Recommended for New Designs
The ADF4159 is a 13 GHz, fractional-N frequency synthesizer with modulation and both fast and slow waveform generation capability. The part uses a 25-bit...
Datasheet
ADF4159 on Analog.com
ADRF5300
Recommended for New Designs
The ADRF5300 is a reflective, SPDT switch manufactured in the silicon process.
The ADRF5300 is developed for 5G applications ranging from 24 GHz to 32...
Datasheet
ADRF5300 on Analog.com
Hi, I am currently using the ADF5901, ADF5904, ADF4159, and ADRF5300 to design a 4T8R MIMO radar system. Previously, I successfully verified the feasibility of a 2T4R system without using the ADRF5300. In this design, I utilized a Wilkinson power splitter to distribute the LO signal to two ADF5904 chips for achieving 8RX. Two ADRF5300 switches allow one ADF5901 to control four channels in a time-division manner.
During the design and testing phase, I found that the quality of the IF signals for all channels was acceptable; however, there were issues with angle-of-arrival estimation. After extensive validation, I suspect that the four signals generated by the ADF5901 may be problematic. Theoretically, for a 4T8R array, the phase trends of the 8-channel data obtained from each TX transmission should be consistent. However, testing revealed significant issues with this consistency. It’s not that a specific TX channel is unstable; rather, the phase trends from different TXs exhibit variations across different data collection sessions.
I would like to inquire about the potential causes of this issue. Below are the phase results from three signal acquisitions, where 1 to 8 represent the 8 RX channels, and different curves indicate the phase changes of the received signals corresponding to different TX transmissions. In the embedded control system, both RX and LO are continuously active. TX is controlled through register 0 of the ADF5901, switching channels 1 and 2, while each channel is managed by the ADRF5300 for switching to form four transmit paths, with a channel switch occurring every ten chirps. This part of the embedded control is illustrated in the diagram. The STM32 is used for control, and the history represents the ramp output from the technical ADF4159's MUXOUT. The high and low levels of PA11 and PA10 are used to control the two ADRF5300 switches.
I would appreciate your assistance in understanding why different TXs produce varying phase trends. Thank you!


Hi,
Did you implement a recalibration sequence after powering up? It seems like, temperature change during operation might create different phase values.
We recommend calling the recalibration sequence for every 10°C temperature change.
Thanks
Emrecan
Hello, I would like to ask whether the output power adjustment of the ADF5901 is controlled through Register 1, specifically DB12~DB5? Does 0 correspond to -20dBm and 255 correspond to 8dBm? Is the adjustment evenly spaced? If I want to set the output power to around 0dBm, should I set it to approximately 183?
I plan to connect a power amplifier (PA), the HMC863ALC4, to the output. This amplifier has a gain of 24dB and a P1dB output of 27dB. Therefore, setting the ADF5901 output to 0dBm seems more appropriate. Would this approach be feasible?
Additionally, do I need to adjust the AUX BUFFER GAIN in the ADF5901? What is its function?
Hello, I would like to ask whether the output power adjustment of the ADF5901 is controlled through Register 1, specifically DB12~DB5? Does 0 correspond to -20dBm and 255 correspond to 8dBm? Is the adjustment evenly spaced? If I want to set the output power to around 0dBm, should I set it to approximately 183?
I plan to connect a power amplifier (PA), the HMC863ALC4, to the output. This amplifier has a gain of 24dB and a P1dB output of 27dB. Therefore, setting the ADF5901 output to 0dBm seems more appropriate. Would this approach be feasible?
Additionally, do I need to adjust the AUX BUFFER GAIN in the ADF5901? What is its function?
please refer to below thread.
ADF5901 output power - Q&A - RF and Microwave - EngineerZone
ADF5901 output power issue. - Q&A - RF and Microwave - EngineerZone
Thanks,
Emrecan