Post Go back to editing

ADRF5720 power sequence

Category: Hardware
Product Number: ADRF5720

Is there any risk of damage to the ADRF5720 if applying -3.3V before +3.3V?

Parents
  • Hi Dan

    Thank for the question. Yes, the power-up sequence is required in order to avoid transient currents occurring that could damage the part.

    Could you confirm that you measure 11 mA transient current when VSS=0 while VDD is ramping up? If so, could you share the ramp-up details (a waveform screenshot would be great).

    Regards

    Gokhan

  • Hi Gokhan
    the transient response was done with 0V on VSS and -3.3V on VSS. the response was the same. 
    1.72V on 160ohm resistor (excluding cable loss) = 11mA
    Since the response is the same, can I conclude that I can apply negative voltage before positive voltage?

    Dan

  • Hi Dan

    Thanks for sharing the waveform. Could you also respond to the following?

    1) What is the decoupling cap value connected to the VDD pin?

    2) Is it possible to measure the voltage drop at the resistor using a differential probe (I am assuming this measurement is from one end of the resistor to the GND)?

    We suggest the correct power-up sequence: VDD is applied before VSS but also wanted to find out the source of the 11mA current value.

    Regards

    Gokhan

Reply
  • Hi Dan

    Thanks for sharing the waveform. Could you also respond to the following?

    1) What is the decoupling cap value connected to the VDD pin?

    2) Is it possible to measure the voltage drop at the resistor using a differential probe (I am assuming this measurement is from one end of the resistor to the GND)?

    We suggest the correct power-up sequence: VDD is applied before VSS but also wanted to find out the source of the 11mA current value.

    Regards

    Gokhan

Children
No Data