Is there any risk of damage to the ADRF5720 if applying -3.3V before +3.3V?
ADRF5720
Recommended for New Designs
The ADRF5720 is a silicon, 6-bit digital attenuator with 31.5 dB attenuation control range in 0.5 dB steps.
This device operates from 9 kHz to 40 GHz with...
Datasheet
ADRF5720 on Analog.com
Is there any risk of damage to the ADRF5720 if applying -3.3V before +3.3V?
I measured 11mA transient current on VDD with or without -3.3V. please explain why the sequence is needed.
Hi Dan
Thank for the question. Yes, the power-up sequence is required in order to avoid transient currents occurring that could damage the part.
Could you confirm that you measure 11 mA transient current when VSS=0 while VDD is ramping up? If so, could you share the ramp-up details (a waveform screenshot would be great).
Regards
Gokhan
Hi Gokhan
the transient response was done with 0V on VSS and -3.3V on VSS. the response was the same.
1.72V on 160ohm resistor (excluding cable loss) = 11mA
Since the response is the same, can I conclude that I can apply negative voltage before positive voltage?
Dan
Hi Dan
Thanks for sharing the waveform. Could you also respond to the following?
1) What is the decoupling cap value connected to the VDD pin?
2) Is it possible to measure the voltage drop at the resistor using a differential probe (I am assuming this measurement is from one end of the resistor to the GND)?
We suggest the correct power-up sequence: VDD is applied before VSS but also wanted to find out the source of the 11mA current value.
Regards
Gokhan