Post Go back to editing

Wide Input Voltage Range

Category: Datasheet/Specs
Product Number: LTC4364


Hello,


I'm working on a design that needs to support a wide input range of 18 to 50V Input. I'm using the LTC4364 as an Ideal Diode Or'ing circuit with Inrush protection, OVP, OCP. The datasheet recommends for inrush protection to add a capacitor from HGATE to Ground to control the inrush current. This however, causes the blocking FET to disable when a fast input transient occurs due to the sudden change on the source node. The datasheet also recommends that the minimum capacitance should be 6.8nF to ensure stability of the overcurrent and overvoltage loops.

My questions are:

1. Is this 6.8nF really a minimum requirement on the HGATE pin?

2. Can I instead place my inrush capacitor between the gate and source nodes rather then gate to ground. This will eliminate the issue of turn-off when a input voltage transient step occurs.

Ask can i put a cap where C5 is, and not have a capacitor where C15 is in the spice model below.

Simulation of what happens with a capacitor where C15 is:

  • It's important that you understand the mechanism how the LTC4364 controls inrush:
    Igate/Cgate=Iinrush/Cout, where Igate=20uA.
    This equation comes from I=C*dv/dt, and you equate the slew rate of the gate to the slew rate of the output.
    From this, we know if we slew the gate voltage slowly, the output will follow, thus controlling inrush.
    While Vout is slewing, the HGATE FET is partially on, so Vgs will be at its threshold voltage (~5V).

    Back to your question: you want to do an input step and for Vout to follow Vin.
    But we now know that Vout follows Vgate, and settles at Vin.
    If Vout did follow the Vin step, there would be a corresponding inrush into Cout which would cause Vin to collapse.
    Your waveforms are as expected.

  • Thank you for responding. To clarify, my question is: The datasheet specifies that 6.8nF is the minimum for loop stability. Can you please confirm that that is really the minimum capacitance you'd need on the gate, or can I reduce it more?

    Thanks

  • Case CS-522077-T7G3C0 has been canceled in MSD