Post Go back to editing

LT1054 Charge pump component selection

Category: Hardware
Product Number: LT1054

Hi all,

I’m designing an unregulated dual-rail supply to generate ±12 V from a single +9 V source (either battery or regulated DC PSU). The DC-DC stage is based on the LT1054. The topology follows LT1054 datasheet (dual-output voltage doubler/inverter).

Target load current is very low, about 5 mA per rail (10 mA worst-case including margin).

Questions:

1) Capacitor values

Given the light load, is it possible to reduce the 100 µF (input/output) and 10 µF (flying) capacitors from the reference design?

Modern options I am considering:

  • Option 1: 100 µF aluminum-polymer, 10 µF aluminum-polymer (very low ESR)

  • Option 2: 100 µF aluminum-polymer, 10 µF MLCC (noting MLCC bias-derating)

  • Option 3: 100 µF aluminum electrolytic + 10 µF MLCC in parallel (for ESR balance), 3x 10 µF capacitors MLCC 

Will the very low ESR (options 1 and 2) increase peak current stress on the rectifier diodes and LT1054 internal switches? Is this a real concern at ~5 mA load?

2) Diode selection

The reference design uses 1N4001 diodes. Since forward-drop wastes headroom in this application, would a Schottky diode be acceptable (or preferable)?

Given the low current, could the diode be scaled down (e.g., SMD 40–60 V, 0.5 A Schottky)? This would reduce losses and help post-regulation margin.

Any practical guidance or experience with reducing capacitor sizes and using modern low-ESR parts with the LT1054 would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

Parents
  • Hello,

    Yes using the 10:1 for the caps is recommended. I do not know if 10uf or 22uF will work best for this particular application. Evaluation on the bench is the best way to determine this. 

    The frequency can be increased by adding a cap from C1 to the OSC pin as mentioned in the pin description.

    I actually do not know if increasing the frequency will improve or make startup behavior worst. 

    This part was before my time but I am quite sure it was not derived from the MAX or ICL 7660. I do not even believe it was derived from the LTC660 or LTC1044. 

Reply
  • Hello,

    Yes using the 10:1 for the caps is recommended. I do not know if 10uf or 22uF will work best for this particular application. Evaluation on the bench is the best way to determine this. 

    The frequency can be increased by adding a cap from C1 to the OSC pin as mentioned in the pin description.

    I actually do not know if increasing the frequency will improve or make startup behavior worst. 

    This part was before my time but I am quite sure it was not derived from the MAX or ICL 7660. I do not even believe it was derived from the LTC660 or LTC1044. 

Children
No Data