Post Go back to editing

LT1054 Charge pump component selection

Category: Hardware
Product Number: LT1054

Hi all,

I’m designing an unregulated dual-rail supply to generate ±12 V from a single +9 V source (either battery or regulated DC PSU). The DC-DC stage is based on the LT1054. The topology follows LT1054 datasheet (dual-output voltage doubler/inverter).

Target load current is very low, about 5 mA per rail (10 mA worst-case including margin).

Questions:

1) Capacitor values

Given the light load, is it possible to reduce the 100 µF (input/output) and 10 µF (flying) capacitors from the reference design?

Modern options I am considering:

  • Option 1: 100 µF aluminum-polymer, 10 µF aluminum-polymer (very low ESR)

  • Option 2: 100 µF aluminum-polymer, 10 µF MLCC (noting MLCC bias-derating)

  • Option 3: 100 µF aluminum electrolytic + 10 µF MLCC in parallel (for ESR balance), 3x 10 µF capacitors MLCC 

Will the very low ESR (options 1 and 2) increase peak current stress on the rectifier diodes and LT1054 internal switches? Is this a real concern at ~5 mA load?

2) Diode selection

The reference design uses 1N4001 diodes. Since forward-drop wastes headroom in this application, would a Schottky diode be acceptable (or preferable)?

Given the low current, could the diode be scaled down (e.g., SMD 40–60 V, 0.5 A Schottky)? This would reduce losses and help post-regulation margin.

Any practical guidance or experience with reducing capacitor sizes and using modern low-ESR parts with the LT1054 would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

Parents
  • Hello,

    This is an extremally old part that was designed before there were many very high value MLCC caps. Using an aluminum polymer provides some ESR which helps reduce switching currents slightly. Low ESR is good to help reduce ripple. Using all 10uF caps should be OK for this. Please look at the ripple voltage to make sure it is acceptable. Trying 1uF where the other caps were 10uF might be worthwhile as well. If this is an S8 package they might all need to be 10uF. 

    Reducing to a Schottky diode might be OK. Please be aware of the leakage currents in the Schottky diode. Some Schottky diodes get very leaky especially at higher temps. 

Reply
  • Hello,

    This is an extremally old part that was designed before there were many very high value MLCC caps. Using an aluminum polymer provides some ESR which helps reduce switching currents slightly. Low ESR is good to help reduce ripple. Using all 10uF caps should be OK for this. Please look at the ripple voltage to make sure it is acceptable. Trying 1uF where the other caps were 10uF might be worthwhile as well. If this is an S8 package they might all need to be 10uF. 

    Reducing to a Schottky diode might be OK. Please be aware of the leakage currents in the Schottky diode. Some Schottky diodes get very leaky especially at higher temps. 

Children
No Data