Post Go back to editing

MOSFET Selection LTC4364

Category: Hardware
Product Number: LTC4364

Good day,

  • Our design is currently as follows:

  • The MOSFETs we are using are: SQJQ184E-T1_GE3
  • After multiple over-current and over-voltage tests we end up with MOSFETs which have blown.
  • We are drawing 10A and increased the input voltage to 33V which triggers the over-voltage protection.
  • The circuit switches the channel off correctly.
  • After the retry timer is complete the LTC4364 tries to switch the channel on again. With the 10A still being drawn on the output it manages to get to 10 V.
  • At 10V the output voltage suddenly rises sharply. Inspection shows that the MOSFET blew.
  • During the turn-on the LTC4364 required 0.5 mS to switch the MOSFET on before it blew.
  • There were 33V across the MOSFET with an output resistance of 3 Ohm.
  • 10 V were reached before the MOSFET blew.
  • 10A * Vmosfet(33->23V) * rise time(0,5s) = 392 W
  • I realise in this case that the 600W of the SQJQ184E degenerates rapidly as it warms up and hits its 200 W limit at 125 C.

What are our current options?

  1. Is there a way to make the turn-on time faster?
  2. Which MOSFET would you recommend if we were to replace the SQJQ184E? We are very space-constrained. Should we look at a MOSFET with smaller input capacitance?
  3. The maximum expected current through the channel is 60 A, this will only occur once the MOSFET is switched completely on.
  4. The maximum turn-on current is 20 A.

Edit Notes

Updated Title
[edited by: Bubbles27 at 5:42 PM (GMT -4) on 22 Aug 2024]
Parents
  • Is there a way to make the turn-on time faster?

    Speeding up start-up time and increasing inrush is not the answer to blown FETs.
    Once you select the inrush current and assume max Vin, check if the HGATE FET has the Safe Operating Area (SOA) performance to survive start-up.

    Which MOSFET would you recommend if we were to replace the SQJQ184E? We are very space-constrained. Should we look at a MOSFET with smaller input capacitance?

    Small Ciss isn't important in hotswap applications, since we intentionally add Cgate for inrush control.
    You want FETs optimized for SOA performance.
    Here's an example of such a FET: PSMN3R7-100BSE

    • The maximum expected current through the channel is 60 A, this will only occur once the MOSFET is switched completely on.
    • The maximum turn-on current is 20 A.

    Make sure the load is off until Cout is charged (Inrush=0A).
    Otherwise, the load current is added to the SOA stress.
    Use the ENOUT pin to signal the downstream load that start-up is complete.

  • Thank you for the response.

    • The SOA of the PSMN3R7-100BSE does not look better than the SQJQ184E
      • Make sure the load is off until Cout is charged (Inrush=0A).
        Otherwise, the load current is added to the SOA stress.
      Yes that is what I feared. We were hoping to save on having to protect an output to a DAL-B device which we expect not to fail but having the possibility that it short circuits causes this problem.
      • Use the ENOUT pin to signal the downstream load that start-up is complete.
      Yes, we will reconsider our power architecture.
  • Regarding the SOA graphs, I'll refer you to this article about the Spirito Effect from the great Dan Eddleman.
    https://www.analog.com/en/resources/technical-articles/mosfet-safe-operating-area-and-hot-swap-circuits.html

    I'm skeptical because the SQJQ184E-T1_GE3 SOA curves are perfectly straight and in parallel.
    There's no Spirito region, so I wouldn't trust its advertised SOA performance.

  • Thank you Ashapiro, this is really helpful. I will look into this article. Which MOSFET manufacturer would you say is trustworthy?

Reply Children