Post Go back to editing

LT4294 Power delivery issue


Few months ago I had a session here related to the LT4294IMS#PBF PD issue, that was found to be related to the hot swap N-FET SOA characteristics, that were not good enough.

I have replaced the transistor(to CSD19537Q3) with better characteristics, that allow more than 3A continuous current through it, based on the SOA graph.

Unfortunately we still facing nearly the same problem and need your help.

Problem description:

LT4294 requests 62W, but board in fact, consumes no more than 30W.

The LT4294 schematics implemented according to the data sheet and the evaluation board schematics(DC2911A). We are facing same behavior on all boards we assembled. We use IEEE802.3bt certified POE supply(POE60U-1BT). After successful classification/negotiation board starts and continues working for few hours, then LT4294 and N-FET became extremally hot, PWRGD start oscillating like a clock - rising and failing cycles, the N-FET output shows rising and failing behavior like a saw. The input is stable and equal ~56V. LT4294 is intended to pass power to the Ethernet switch, IP cams, radar, CPU, USB HUB and some on-board electronics. The working mode is not changing along all hours(in some case minutes) till the failure. We have no any problem working several days on AUX power|(12VDC) with the same board, indicating there is no problem in onboard electronics, but once we wish to work from POE problem appear after few hours, usually within first couple hours(it can be few minutes sometime).

Please see attached schematics. I can provide layout if need...I have no clue what is wrong here as we are already several month in the same session and it seems that everting was tested and checked.. Please help.



Typo corrected
[edited by: ALirov586 at 8:11 AM (GMT -4) on 19 Jul 2021]
  • If problem appears we disconnect board from power, it cools, we reconnect it back, it classifies and works till the next failure. 

  • Hello,

    I have investigated meanwhile the issue and here are some more info. In attached snapshots RED(Ch3) is a hot swap N-CH DRAIN, BLUE(Ch4)-SOURSE, YELLOW(Ch)-GATE: 
    Snapshots presents classification against the PSE and failing conditions.

    I also measured temperature on a package. It somehow raised up to 70 degrees, probably from the power supply that located no far from it. The GATE disassertion appears when the temperature reaches about 70 degree on the package(measured with a thermopcouple and it is not very precise). Once again, we have no problem to operate with the board if AUX input(of LT4294) is used. The mode of operation not changing during the test. We expecting to consume about 30W at this mode.

    Please suggest what can be wrong here.

  • It would be nice to get at least a hand wave here.

  • Apologies for the delayed response.

    Have you tried checking the voltage at the AUX pin? You mention the board ambient around the IC quite high, and I see from your schematic you are using schottky diodes for the AUX pin. That diode looks like it could have 40uA of leakage current at 50V and 60C junction temperature. If this flows into the auxiliary divider, it might be enough to look like an auxiliary power source is connected. This would cause the hotswap FET to turn off, then leakage current would go away so the FET would turn back on... and rinse and repeat. Try re-running this test with R111 removed and let me know how ti goes. I would also recommend replacing these diodes with silicon or lower leakage schottkys.

    Best Regards,


  • Hi Eric,

    I understand you theory, but there is no situation when both, AUX and POE are connected at the same time. I tested when only AUX(12V, lower board temperature and works fine) is connected or when only POE is connected(reach ~70 degree on package and fails).

    At time I waited for response I have made another test: I cooled the board with the fan, so the maximum temperature on LT4294 on a package surface reached 55 degrees. In such situation no fail occurs.

    I also changed the hot swap transistor(Q5) to the TO220 package suited for 110A continues and soldered it outside the board, just to be convinced that there is no repeated transistor issue.

    Do you have another idea? Do you think the test you suggested still worth to implement?

    I can order the LT4294HMS#PBF (125 degree qualified) do you think it worth it? Can be a batch issue?



  • I still think this might be a leakage issue. You would not see this issue with the auxiliary supply connected, only when just PoE is connected and the board is hot. During PoE operation, the AUX pin should be at 0V, but if there is approximately 14uA leaking through D6 that might be enough to make pull the AUX pin above its threshold voltage. This would turn off Q5, which would cause the voltage across D8 to droop which would decrease the leakage current. Less leakage current would cause the AUX pin voltage to decrease, so Q5 will turn back on again. If D8 is still leaking this process could repeat. 

    You could test this by either disconnected D8 or R111, it'd be nice to rule out this as the cause of this behavior. I would also suggest changing D6, D7, and D8 to silicon diodes as these are just for signaling an auxiliary supply is present.

    Best Regards,


  • Hi Eric,

    Great idea!! Thanks for sharing your suggestions. I definitely will test it and let you know the results.


  • Hi Eric,

    I have removed the D8 from the assembly and it seems that problem was solved. I will manage to replace this diode.

    Thanks again,