LTC3891
Recommended for New Designs
The LTC3891 is a high performance step-down switching regulator DC/DC controller that drives an all N-channel synchronous power MOSFET stage. A constant...
Datasheet
LTC3891 on Analog.com
LTC3895
Recommended for New Designs
The LTC3895 is a high performance step-down switching regulator DC/DC controller that drives an all N-channel synchronous power MOSFET stage that can operate...
Datasheet
LTC3895 on Analog.com
LTC3858-1
Production
The LTC3858-1 is a high performance dual step-down switching regulator controller that drives all N-channel synchronous power MOSFET stages. A constant...
Datasheet
LTC3858-1 on Analog.com
Sorry, repeat question that I asked in the wrong forum.
Has anyone used the PLLIN/MODE for external synchronization?
I've tried all the options shown on the evaluation board schematic and had no luck.
Other circuits that I've designed recently using the LTC3895 and LTC3858-1, have both worked as described, locking on from a wide range of frequencies.
I just can't get this feature to work in the LTC3891.
Hi Wsurfdoug,
hope you are doing well.
Are you testing it on the actual demo board or did you build a prototype and referenced the design on the demo board? If you are working on the demo board, try to remove the JP2 that selects the mode of operation since the PLL already locks the frequency with respect to the external source that can be set between 75kHz and 750kHz.
Regards,
Siglo
Hi Wsurfdoug,
hope you are doing well.
Are you testing it on the actual demo board or did you build a prototype and referenced the design on the demo board? If you are working on the demo board, try to remove the JP2 that selects the mode of operation since the PLL already locks the frequency with respect to the external source that can be set between 75kHz and 750kHz.
Regards,
Siglo
Hi Siglo,
Thanks for the information. I'm working on my own design that uses the same layout as the demo board. It's hard to get the PLLIN bit wrong.
Unfortunately, it's been a few weeks since I looked at this design as I'm working on another project using the LT8705.
Once I've refreshed myself regarding this issue I'll re-post my findings. I've a sneaky feeling it may be my the test set up that was at fault and I won't know until I repeat the test.
Kind regards,
Doug