groupUrl: https://ez.analog.com/mems/
Analog.com Analog Dialogue Wiki English
Analog.com Analog Dialogue Wiki 简体中文
EngineerZone
EngineerZone
  • Site
  • User
  • Site
  • Search
  • User
EngineerZone
EngineerZone
  • Log in
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Blogs ⌵
    • EZ Spotlight
    • The Engineering Mind
  • Browse ⌵
    • All Groups
    • All Members
  • Support ⌵
    • 3D ToF Depth Sensing
    • A2B
    • Aerospace and Defense (ADEF)
    • Amplifiers
    • Analog Microcontrollers
    • Analysis Control Evaluation (ACE) Software
    • Audio
    • Clock and Timing
    • Condition-Based Monitoring
    • Data Converters
    • Design Tools and Calculators
    • Direct Digital Synthesis (DDS)
    • Embedded Vision Sensing
    • Energy Monitoring and Metering
    • FPGA Reference Designs
    • Industrial Ethernet
    • Interface and Isolation
    • Low Power RF Transceivers
    • MEMS Inertial Sensors
    • Motor Control Hardware Platforms
    • Optical Sensing
    • Power Management
    • Precision Technology Signal Chains
    • Processors and DSP
    • Reference Circuits
    • RF and Microwave
    • Signal Chain Power (SCP)
    • Switches/Multiplexers
    • Temperature Sensors
    • Video
    • Wide Band RF Transceivers
    • Wireless Sensor Networks Reference Library
  • About EZ
  • More
  • Cancel
  • 主页
  • 浏览 ⌵
    • 收件箱
    • 个人设置
    • 会员
    • 专区列表
  • 论坛专区 ⌵
    • 放大器专区
    • 精密转换器专区
    • 音频专区
    • ADE电能计量专区
    • MEMS和传感器专区
    • 接口和隔离专区
    • Power 中文专区
    • ADUC微处理器专区
    • 锁相环专区
    • 开关和多路复用器专区
    • 温度传感器
    • 基准电压源专区
    • 资源库
    • 论坛使用指南
    • 技术支持参考库
    • 在线研讨会
    • 论坛社群活动
    • 论坛激励活动
  • More
  • Cancel
MEMS Inertial Sensors
MEMS Inertial Sensors
Documents ADIS16209: Stability and sensitivity
  • Q&A
  • Discussions
  • Documents
  • File Uploads
  • Video/Images
  • Tags
  • Managers
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
MEMS Inertial Sensors requires membership for participation - click to join
  • +Documents
  • +3-D Model/STEP: FAQ
  • +AD22282-A-R2: FAQ
  • +ADIS16000: FAQ
  • +ADIS16003 MTBF: FAQ
  • +ADIS16006: FAQ
  • +ADIS16201: FAQ
  • +ADIS16203: FAQ
  • +ADIS16204: FAQ
  • -ADIS16209: FAQ
    • FAQ: ADIS162xx LGA Assembly Guidelines
    • FAQ: ADIS16209 Evaluation Tool Overview
    • FAQ: ADIS16209 Self-Test Management
    • FAQ: ADIS16209/ADIS16265 Lead Integrity
    • FAQ: ADIS16209/ADIS16265 Pb-free Assembly Tips
    • FAQ: ADIS1620x/21x/22x Power Regulator Suggestion
    • FAQ: ADIS1620x/21x/22x Power Supply Considersations
    • FAQ: Tilt Angle Window Detector
    • FAQ: Tilt Angle Window Detector with Evaluation Tools
    • Bias Stability over 1 Year
    • IMU Evaluation Software Bug: ADIS16209 Data Capture
    • The direction of axis X and axis Y
    • ADIS16201 and ADIS16209 Pins 8 and 10 Grounded - Performance Issues
    • ADIS16209 Datasheet Error: Address code length
    • ADIS16209 Datasheet Error; SPI Address Code Missing MSB
    • ADIS16209 Datecode Revision Change
    • ADIS16209 self-test
    • ADIS16209: How do I connect pins 7,8,10,11? There are contradictions in datasheet.
    • ADIS16209: Stability and sensitivity
    • ADIS1620x Evaluation Board dimensions
  • +ADIS16210: FAQ
  • +ADIS16223: FAQ
  • +ADIS16227: FAQ
  • +ADIS16228: FAQ
  • +ADIS16229: FAQ
  • +ADIS16240: FAQ
  • +ADIS16255: FAQ
  • +ADIS16355: FAQ
  • +ADIS16364: FAQ
  • +ADIS16365: FAQ
  • +ADIS16375: FAQ
  • +ADIS16385: FAQ
  • +ADIS16400: FAQ
  • +ADIS16405: FAQ
  • +ADIS16407: FAQ
  • +ADIS16445: FAQ
  • +ADIS16448: FAQ
  • +ADIS16460: FAQ
  • +ADIS16475: FAQ
  • +ADIS16477: FAQ
  • +ADIS1647x: FAQ
  • +ADIS16480: FAQ
  • +ADISUSB: FAQ
  • +ADXL001: FAQ
  • +ADXL203: FAQ
  • +ADIS16300: FAQ
  • +ADIS16485: FAQ
  • +ADIS16488: FAQ
  • +ADIS16488A: FAQ
  • +ADIS16490: FAQ
  • +ADIS16495: FAQ
  • +ADIS16497: FAQ
  • +ADXL103: FAQ
  • +ADXL150: FAQ
  • +ADxL193: FAQ
  • +ADXL202: FAQ
  • +ADXL206: FAQ
  • +ADXL210: FAQ
  • +ADXL210E: FAQ
  • +ADXL213: FAQ
  • +ADxL230: FAQ
  • +ADXL278: FAQ
  • +ADXL312: FAQ
  • +ADXL313: FAQ
  • +ADXL320: FAQ
  • +ADXL321: FAQ
  • +ADXL322: FAQ
  • +ADXL327: FAQ
  • +ADXL335: FAQ
  • +ADXL337: FAQ
  • +ADXL345: FAQ
  • +AD22290: FAQ
  • +ADIS16003: FAQ
  • +ADIS16133: FAQ
  • +ADIS16135: FAQ
  • +ADIS16265: FAQ
  • +ADIS16305: FAQ
  • +ADXL326: FAQ
  • +ADXL350: FAQ
  • +ADXL362: FAQ
  • +ADXL375: FAQ
  • +ADXL377: FAQ
  • +ADXL78: FAQ
  • +ADXRS150: FAQ
  • +ADXRS290: FAQ
  • +ADXRS300: FAQ
  • +ADXRS401: FAQ
  • +ADXRS453: FAQ
  • +ADXRS610: FAQ
  • +ADxRS614: FAQ
  • +ADXRS623: FAQ
  • +ADXRS646: FAQ
  • +ADXRS652: FAQ
  • +ADXRS800: FAQ
  • +ADIS16136: FAQ
  • +ADIS16137: FAQ
  • +ADIS16266: FAQ
  • +ADIS16334: FAQ
  • +ADIS16362 Evaluation Tool: FAQ
  • +ADIS16364 Evaluation Tool: FAQ
  • +ADIS16367: FAQ
  • +ADIS163xx: FAQ
  • +ADIS16489: FAQ
  • +ADIS1648x: FAQ
  • +ADXL346: FAQ
  • +ADXL363: FAQ
  • +EVAL-ADIS: FAQ
  • +EVAL-ADIS2: FAQ
  • +Filtering Functions: FAQ
  • +General: FAQ
  • +Gyroscope: FAQ
  • +Hard & Soft Iron Correction: FAQ
  • +ISEB USB: FAQ
  • +IMU: FAQ
  • +MEMS: FAQ
  • +Slip Ring Interface: FAQ
  • +SPI Troubleshooting: FAQ
  • +TEMP_OUT Variation: FAQ
  • +Test Procedures: FAQ

ADIS16209: Stability and sensitivity

Q 

For my application, timing is nearly no problem. I would rotate the sensor
slowly (3 rev/min) around the axis which inclination should be determined. The
measured acceleration shows a sine-dependency with rotation angle, where the
amplitude is proportional to the tilt angle of the rotation axis. Thus the
total measurement is insensitive to the sensor's offset. I am now concerned
about the temperature stability and temperature hyteresis of the sensitivity.
The operating temperature range is planned to be 5-45°. We could do a precise
factory calibration of the sensitivity at 25°C to compensate for sensor to
sensor-variations. Thus we would also limit the temperature deviation from this
reference measurement to +/-20°C. We can allow the in-field deviation of the
sensitivity with respect to our in-factory calibration of 0.01°/5° = 0.2%. The
values from the datasheets of both sensors are are larger but also given for
larger operating temperature ranges. From fig.12 of the datasheet for ADXL213,
it would seem as if the example curves for this sensor would meet my
requirements. Do you know how the sensitivity behaves in this limited
temperature range for both models, also concerning hysteresis, and if they will
fulfil my requirements? For sensor ADXL213, the temperature effect on the
sensitivity accounts for 0.3%. The sensitivity is specified from 27 to 33%/g.
What effects account for the remaining deviation? Is the remaining deviation
fixed (with time and other parameters) and can be compensated using one
individual measurement? An accuracy of 0.01° corresponds to 1.7e-4 g. To
achieve this, the noise should be below this value. Can I expect for the
digital outputs of both sensors, that the noise after averaging over timt t
follows a 1/sqrt(t) behaviour? In that case, both sensors would meet my
requirements after slightly more than 1 second of averaging. The digital
resolution of the ADIS16209 is 0.244 mg = 0.014° and thus above my accuracy
goal. I expect, that with averaging I will nevertheless achieve this goal. On
page 8 of the datasheet for ADXL213 you state: "As a result, there is
essentially no quantization error or nonmonotonic behavior". Can you quantify
"essentially no" or tell me at least that it is better than what I need? The
measurement would be sensitive to drifts of the offset value while measuring.
Can you specify or at least comment on the stability of the offset on this long
time scale, assuming the temperature would be constant?

 

A 

I sent four questions to another engineer, who has a little more insight into
the ADXL213 operation than I do, and here is the summary of the responses:

Q: Have you seen any customer accomplish 0.01 degrees of accuracy using the
ADXL213?  
A: No. That doesn't mean it's not been done though. Still, 170µG accuracy seems
impractical to me (resolution, maybe - but not accuracy).

Q: Thermal hysteresis over 5-45 degC. 
A: I have no data for such a small temperature range, but my guess would be
0.5mg. (over a temperature range of 160°C I have occasionally seen as much as
8mg, so over a temperature range that is one quarter as large  I would guess
that it would be ~one sixteenth).

Q: Noise: In a previous discussion, I believe that you offered that the 1/f
frequency was approximately 0.25Hz.  Would I be correct in that 160ug x
sqrt(1.57*0.25) = 100ug is the lowest noise we could expect?  
A: Seems reasonable.

Q: Pulse-width timing: I have never used an accelerometer in this fashion. 
Does this become a performance limit, or has this factor already been
incorporated into the sensitivity graphs?  
A: If the PWM period is set to  10ms (100Hz) with a scale factor of 30%/g, one
g has a pulse width of 3ms. So 100µg would be 0.3µs (not very long). The timer
used would need to have a count time of half this (150ns) or less.

With regards to "end of life," we have not been able to test to the level of
accuracy you are describing.  Getting to ~0.1 degree of dimensional stability
in test platforms has been challenging, but that represents the level we have
taken this too up to this point.  We have reason to believe that the device
will perform better, but believe the fixturing and test methods are handicapped
in their ability to isolate true sensor behaviors.  Based on the information I
have, I can't offer assurance to the level of performance you seek on either
ADIS16209 or ADXL213.

I understand your approach to calibrating PCB shifts but my question was
focused on planarity/flatness over temp cycles, moisture absorption, vibration,
etc.  2um is a dimensional accuracy that took decades to accomplish at the
silicon level.  I am not saying this is impossible on PCBs, but I would not be
surprised if it required consideration at some point. 

With regards to the ADC input, these typical values are normally pretty
conservative and make some allowance for anticipated drifts, but keep in mind,
they are listed as typicals, and not min/max limits. 

The only parting thought I would have regarding the ADIS16209 would center on
its calibration over temperature and supply.  While it was not targeted at the
same performance level, you may find value in the first-order corrections for
your pursuit of the tighter performance level over a more narrow temperature
range.

  • adis16209
  • Share
  • History
  • More
  • Cancel
Comments
Anonymous
Related
 
社交网络
快速链接
  • 关于ADI
  • Partners
  • 模拟对话
  • 职业
  • 联系我们
  • 投资信息
  • 新闻中心
  • 质量和可靠性
  • 办事处与代理商
  • Analog Garage
语言
  • English
  • 简体中文
  • 日本語
  • Руccкий
电子快讯

欲获得最新ADI产品、设计工具、培训与活动的相关新闻与文章,请从我们的在线快讯中选出您感兴趣的产品类别,每月或每季度都会发送至您的收件箱。

订阅
Switch to mobile view
Analog Logo
© 1995 - 2022 Analog Devices, Inc. All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备09046653号-1
  • ©
  • 1995 - 2022 Analog Devices, Inc. All Rights Reserved
  • 沪ICP备09046653号-1
  • 网站地图
  • 隐私和保密政策
  • 隐私设置
  • 使用条款
 
Social
Quick Links
  • About ADI
  • Partners
  • Analog Dialogue
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Investor Relations
  • News Room
  • Quality & Reliability
  • Sales & Distribution
  • Analog Garage
Languages
  • English
  • 简体中文
  • 日本語
  • Руccкий
Newsletters

Interested in the latest news and articles about ADI products, design tools, training and events? Choose from one of our 12 newsletters that match your product area of interest, delivered monthly or quarterly to your inbox.

Sign Up
Switch to mobile view
Analog Logo
© 1995 - 2022 Analog Devices, Inc. All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备09046653号-1
  • ©
  • 1995 - 2022 Analog Devices, Inc. All Rights Reserved
  • 沪ICP备09046653号-1
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy & Security
  • Privacy Settings
  • Terms of use
EngineerZone Uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience in our community. For more information on cookies, please read our Privacy & Security Statement.