My customers are planning dead-reckoning by gyroscope.And we are comparing ADXRS450 and ADXRS290.
ADXRS450 Sensitivity 80 LSB / ° / sec, Offset ± 3 ° / secADXRS290 sensitivity 200 LSB / ° / sec, offset ± 9 ° / sec
We are trying to cancel offsets by calibration.That seems ADXS290 is better.
However, ADXRS290 is a device for "Wearable products" use.I think the ADXRS450 is superior for industrial applications because the ADXR 450 is a device for "Rotation sensing industrial and instrumentation" use.
What is the performance point of the ADXRS450's superiority?Is the "SHOCK AND VIBRATION IMMUNITY" of the ADXS450 superior to the ADXR 290?
Thank you for your post. We don't presume to take a strong position of superiority in either. Each device was specified in a manner that supported use in the applications that they were originally developed to support. The ADXRS290 does offer two axes in one package, has better noise and is probably in the form factor that you can expect next-generation products to be in. Have they considered any of the IMU products?