Post Go back to editing

Consistently strange readings from ADXL375

Thread Summary

The user is experiencing incorrect X, Y, and Z-axis readings from the ADXL375 accelerometer, even after swapping the chip. The final answer suggests that the readings are within the expected ±6000 mg 0g offset range for this high gee part and recommends calibration to correct the offsets. The ADXL375 is designed for shock detection, which can result in larger offsets compared to tilt-sensing accelerometers.
AI Generated Content
Category: Software
Product Number: ADXL375

I have an ADXL375 chip in a breadboard that I am reading and writing using an NXP processor over I2C. I am applying a minimal configuration to the device and attempting to read the X, Y, and Z-axis readings while the device is motionless with minimal ambient vibration, and the values don't seem correct.

Here is my register configuration:

Register 0x2C: 0x0A (100 Hz)
Register 0x2D: 0x08 (Set measure bit)
Register 0x31: 0x0B

Here are a couple of the X, Y, and Z-axis readings that I see when I read the data registers and do the necessary conversion to g's:

ADXL375 is flat and right-side-up (I expect 0,0,1):
X reading: 0.097999
Y reading: 0.636999
Z reading: 2.645999

ADXL375 is upside-down (I expect 0,0,-1):
X reading: -0.097999
Y reading: 0.734999
Z reading: 0.833000

ADXL375 is positioned vertically (I expect 1,0,0):
X reading: 1.176000
Y reading: 0.881999
Z reading: 1.666000

Since the values that I'm reading don't match my expectations, initially I thought that this particular ADXL375 chip might just need calibration and have offsets applied to each of the axis readings. However, when I swap out the ADXL375 for a DIFFERENT ADXL375 chip and run the same test, I am seeing (roughly) the same measurements as the first chip!

My questions:
Based on my readings, does it appear that my chip(s) are behaving properly? Am I overlooking something in my configuration, or is this just a matter of needing to apply offsets to my readings in order for my readings to match my expectations?

Parents
  • Hello  I do not have an ADXL375 board available right now to crosscheck your setup, but per DS specs you are within the expected min/max +- 6000 mg 0g offset values.

    Keep in mind this is a high gee part intended for shock detection and the offset values can be larger than in accelerometers scoping tilt sensing, still you should be just fine fixing this with calibration.

    Another suggestion is exploring ADXL372 (Rev. C) as it also includes a HPF in it signal chain.

    hope this helps,

    Mario SM

Reply
  • Hello  I do not have an ADXL375 board available right now to crosscheck your setup, but per DS specs you are within the expected min/max +- 6000 mg 0g offset values.

    Keep in mind this is a high gee part intended for shock detection and the offset values can be larger than in accelerometers scoping tilt sensing, still you should be just fine fixing this with calibration.

    Another suggestion is exploring ADXL372 (Rev. C) as it also includes a HPF in it signal chain.

    hope this helps,

    Mario SM

Children
No Data