ADXL354
Recommended for New Designs
The analog output ADXL354 and the digital output ADXL355 are low noise density, low 0 g offset drift, low power, 3-axis
accelerometers with selectable...
Datasheet
ADXL354 on Analog.com
ADXL355
Recommended for New Designs
The analog output ADXL354 and the digital output ADXL355 are low noise density, low 0 g offset drift, low power, 3-axis accelerometers with selectable...
Datasheet
ADXL355 on Analog.com
The ADXL354 data specification indicates that the typical value of the 0G temperature offset is |0.1|mg, and the maximum is |0.15|mg, so the typical value of the offset between 25 °C and 125 °C can be calculated to be 100*0.1mg=10mg.
But why is it that in the test picture in the datasheet you provided, the maximum XYZ offset is only 3.12mg, then the actual typical value should be 3.12/100°C(125°C-25°C)=0.032mg/c, but isn’t it?
Can you explain your method of calculating typical values and maximum and minimum values from experimental data? Thank you and have a nice day
www.analog.com/.../adxl354_adxl355.pdf
Hi yaro-0916 ,
that seems to be a typo on the datasheet, we will work internally to correct it.
The expected typical 0g temperature coefficient is +/-0.02 mg/C. Similar to the specification table for ADXL355.
I hope this helps,
Pablo.
Thank you~ By the way, is the temperature offset coefficient the result of fitting temperature and offset?
yes, that is correct. Notice that there is a footnote on the that describe that we consider the slope calculated from two sections of the temperature range. -40C to 25C and 25 to 125C .
I hope this helps,
Pablo.