Post Go back to editing

The misbehavior of the spice model of ADG721.cir

Thread Summary

The user observed that the SPICE model of ADG721 behaves as a low-active switch, contrary to the datasheet. The support engineer confirmed the issue and will update the ADG721 and ADG722 SPICE models. The user has since switched to ADG442B, which works correctly.
AI Generated Content

I am working on the spice model of ADG721.cir.  The mux control input works as if it is low-active sw. But this is against what the datasheet says: logic 0 means sw off. Please confirm that spice model is corrent or not.

Many thanks. jo

Parents
  • Thank you for response.

    We are using LTspice. We wrapped up subcircuits of ADG721 series by LTspice

    feature.

    Meanwhile, we droped ADG721due to unclear behavior and our new requirement

    of quad inputs.

    Now we are using ADG442B... It works well.

    I am not allowed to share the files.

    Besides circuit files, we can point out the following:

    From the datasheet and the cir files, it is obvious that ADG721 and ADG722

    should be exchanged.

    Best regards,

    jo

    On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:56 AM, mayp <

Reply
  • Thank you for response.

    We are using LTspice. We wrapped up subcircuits of ADG721 series by LTspice

    feature.

    Meanwhile, we droped ADG721due to unclear behavior and our new requirement

    of quad inputs.

    Now we are using ADG442B... It works well.

    I am not allowed to share the files.

    Besides circuit files, we can point out the following:

    From the datasheet and the cir files, it is obvious that ADG721 and ADG722

    should be exchanged.

    Best regards,

    jo

    On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:56 AM, mayp <

Children
No Data

Before You Switch


Switching languages will make ADI Explorer unavailable. Resume your session by switching back to English and reopening ADI Explorer.