Post Go back to editing

ADuM5240 – VDD-to-GND impedance collapses to <100 Ω after a few days of storage

I’m developing the prototype of a power inverter topology. Each prototype PCB carries eight ADuM5240 devices that create isolated rails for gate-drive circuitry.


1 · Observed behaviour

Timeline VDD Left right arrow GND DC-impedance (un-powered) IDD @ 5 V Notes
Immediately after soldering ~20 kΩ (expected) 80 – 100 mA (within spec) Verified on multiple boards
After 3-7 days (board idle, powered or un-powered) 10 – 100 Ω (unexpected) ≫ 100 mA → rail droops All eight devices eventually shift

Reproduced on two boards

  • Board A – powered/tested for a week, then stored in an ESD bag → fault one week later.

  • Board B – never powered, only assembled & stored → same fault after ~1 week.

  • No other IC on the board shows this behaviour.


2 · Assembly / rework conditions

  • Pb-free reflow: peak ≈ 260 °C, ~45 s above 245 °C (6-layer board).

  • Replacements: hot-air ≈ 400 °C for ≤ 30 s.

  • Touch-ups: soldering iron 400 °C.

  • No conformal coat; storage in anti-static bags with desiccant at ~25 °C, 50 % RH.


3 · Questions

  1. Is a delayed drop of VDD-to-GND impedance into the sub-100 Ω range a recognized failure mode for the ADuM5240?

  2. Could the 260 °C reflow peak, 400 °C hot-air, or 400 °C iron introduce latent damage that manifests days later?

  3. Are there recommended storage or moisture-sensitivity precautions (bake-out, conformal coating, etc.) to prevent this degradation?

  4. Once impedance collapses, is the device permanently damaged, or can it be recovered?

  5. Any board-level mitigations you’d suggest (layout tweaks, decoupling, inrush limiting)?


Thank you for your assistance.

Thread Notes

  • Thank you for your inquiry.  Mentioning  for assistance.

  • Hello, 

    Your assembly and storage conditions seem fine for the device.

    I have a few questions:

    • Have you measured the impedance with the devices mounted or loose? 
    • Can you define what rail droop entails? And what is meant by "All eight devices eventually shift"? 
    • For board B, is it correct to say that these parts have never been powered and still see VDD-gnd impedance collapse? 
    • For board A, is it correct the system tested continuously for a week without seeing failure, then after a week in storage the impedance drop was measured?
    • What is the ambient temperature this device is operating in?

    With regards to layout, if you want to post here or email me the schematic / layout I would be able to provide better guidance.

    Best regards,

    Tommy

  • Thanks for getting back, Tommy.

    Here are my responses to your questions-

    1. I have measure the impedance of the IC, both mounted and loose. It remains the same.
    2. By the rail droop, I imply that I start hitting the current limit and the supply isn't able to provide 5V. For instance, with the current limit set to 150 mA, the device consistently hits the limit, and the voltage remains low, typically in the range of 0.5 V to 2 V, depending on how much the input impedance has degraded. I don't see 5V between the Viso and gndiso either.
    3. Yes, this board was assembled and never powered before.
    4. I misspoke. The testing did not continue for a week. It was mostly 1-2 days in the beginning. The board was left on the bench for around 5 days and the board had developed ADuM related issues. 
    5. I don't exactly know, but it ranges between 8-20°C.

    Here is a portion of the schematic that is relevant to the query.

    Let me know if any more information would be required.


  • Hello, 

    So the fact that the unpowered devices fail to startup >1 week after assembly for the first time indicates the devices have failed and damage has potentially been caused during the assembly process of the PCBs. If you like, we can submit an FA request to determine the root cause of the failure. You can reach me at tommy.moran@analog.com if so.

    Best regards,

    Tommy