ADuM1200 drive MMBF170L mosfet

Hi,

My original designing use 5V optocoupler to finish the isolation function, optocoupler output drive the MMBF170L mosfet at ON or OFF state with very low frequency.

Now, I feeling ADuM1200 chip also can finish the same function, the better thing is this way need less current than optocoupler.

Due to I never use ADuM1200 chip to drive the MOSFET, I have a little bit worry about whether it can work well.

Could you helps to take a look it, whether it is a normal usage without risk.

Thanks.

Parents Reply Children
  • Hi, Very thanks for your helps.

    Could you kindly helps to take a look my modified circuit again.

    The Q6 on/off frequenty is very very low, most of time, Q6 keep ON or OFF state without no change, only in some time, Q6 need change state once.

    My analysis is ADUM1200 chip can drive mosfet work well, just due to I never used it before, so, have a littlt bit worry about it, it is very helpful if you can helps to affirm this.

    Weidong.

  • +1
    •  Analog Employees 
    on Aug 23, 2019 12:18 PM in reply to 马伟东

    You might also consider the ADuM1240/45 since the switching frequency is low. These micropower isolators have longer prop delay and a more restricted power supply range, but static power dissipation can be as low as a few µA. The ADuM1240 has a default high output state when the input supply is disabled, while the ADuM1245 is default low.

  • +1
    •  Analog Employees 
    on Aug 27, 2019 5:23 AM in reply to 马伟东

    Hi Weidong:

    The schematic is OK. Only one suggestion to place R84 directly between G, S of Q8. 

    As Dave has suggested, please pay attention to the fai-safe logic status when choosing digital isolator.  it appears during the period of VDD1 and VDD2 to ramp up.

    please go to below link to search for the right part:

    https://www.analog.com/en/parametricsearch/11037

    Chris

  • Hi, Chris,

    I feeling our i-coupler device have some good feature compare with opto-coupler.

    Also, there are 2 items make me confuse, could you share some your thought with me.

    1. I saw that we also have 1 channel i-coupler device, such as: ADuM1100, but the price almost same with 2 channels chip, compare with 1 channel opto-coupler, the 1 channel i-coupler almost have twice price, could you let me know the reason of this, whether the price of 1 channel opto-coupler will become cheaper someday. Or, could you helps to take a look which i-coupler chip can replace HCPL-0600 opto-coupler with lower price complace with ADUM1200. We use ADUM1200 chip at several module, so, I use this chip to replace the opto-coupler now.

    2. You know CMOS device have "Input transition rise or fall rate" requirement, such as: 20ns/V, we must control the input rise or fall rate fast than this data, whether i-coupler device also have this requirement.

    Weidong

  • +1
    •  Analog Employees 
    on Aug 29, 2019 3:13 AM in reply to 马伟东

    Hi Weidong:

    material is only one factor of price, there are also others such as market size, volume......

    besides ADuM1200, ADuM724x and ADuM120/1N could also be considered. 

    there is schmitt trigger circuit designed in side the input port, so there is no transition rate limit.

    Regards

    Chris