1.Quote of the month: "People Who Say They Sleep Like a Baby usually don't have one" - unknown

2. New quiz AQQ302 about Band Gap Reference Voltage generation. OK this one is probably more dedicated to our IC designers...


Good Luck!
1.Quote of the month: "People Who Say They Sleep Like a Baby usually don't have one" - unknown

2. New quiz AQQ302 about Band Gap Reference Voltage generation. OK this one is probably more dedicated to our IC designers...


Good Luck!
We need the slope wrt to T of 86E-6*T*ln(I1/I2)=.0018. Thus
ln(I1/I2) = 0.0018/86E-6 = 20.93. Then I1/I2 = e^(20.93) = 1.23E9. While doable in these days of Amps and nAmps on the same chip, this is a ridiculous ratio.
So G*ln(I1/I2) to the rescue to reduce that factor of 20.93.
G = 20.93/ln(3) = 19.05. Easy to do with an opamp and some well matched resistors.
Q1 .
If I1 > I2, ln(I1/I2) is positive and VBE1-VBE2 is positive to compensate the fall of Vbe with T.
Q2.
For an increase of temperature of 1K, Delta Vbe =k/q Ln(I1/I2).1= 86 10^-6.Ln(I1/I2) witch must compensate -1,8 mV. So, we have:
Ln(I1/I2)= 0.0018/0.000086 ≈ 20.93 so I1/I2=e^20.93 ≈ 1229941640.1
Q3.
If I1/I2 =3, the gain G of the amplifier is 20.93/Ln(3) ≈ 19.0515
Q1. I1 > I2 because Ln(I1/I2) must be +ve. Real band gap references don't vary the current - they vary the current density by increasing the junction area.
Q2. Take the differential dVbe/dT and solve for equivalence with 1.8 mV (noting that the Boltzmann constant is m^2 kg S^-2 K-1). 1.23E9
Q3. Solve for Ln(3) * Gain = 20.89. Gain ~19.
The theory is simple but I assure you that if you have ever had to make either a discrete or integrated band gap reference then this is not so simple.
Yes! Congrats sparky4347@gmail.com !
Bingo kevin.soch@analog.com ! Congratulations!
Right answers and right reasoning lhmgma@gmail.com, big applause!
Well done ob1@aquacoustics.biz ! Thanks
Thanks david.taylor@electradx.com for your feedback! But not sure I understand your reasoning: how did you come from 21 to the gain of 7?