adrv9026 +ZCU102 HDL no-OS reference design (Vivado)

Tagging AndreiDragomir for more information on the ADRV9026.

Hi,

The ORx integration is being worked on and is close to being finished. I believe that the HDL side is done for the most part and you can find it on this branch. We tested it with Linux, but the Linux side still needs some work. We are trying to finish this by the end of the month and then start working on no-OS.

For ADRV9026 evaluation you could also use the ADS9-V2EBZ and TES which can run multiple use cases with working ORx.

Regards,
Andrei

Many thanks for your response. This is very good news. We are planning to work in the beginning with no-OS version. So we will go ahead with this platform and I think some time for us will be spent (learning curve) and in parallel you people making no-OS version in a couple of months would have no impact on our work. 

• We are planning to use eval adrv9026/9029 +ZCU102 HDL no-OS reference design (Vivado) for understanding Analog Devices  DPD module plus also do our own design using  ORx. You said above that you are currently working on ORx integration.

We are planning to buy a couple of these 

1. AMD / Xilinx EK-U1-ZCU102-G
2. ADRV9026-HB/PCBZ

Are these two enough to work with adrv9026/9029 +ZCU102 HDL no-OS reference design (Vivado)

Or there r more components we need to buy?

Thanks

Hi, Coming back to this. What is the no-OS version I can use with  adrv9026 +ZCU102 HDL with ORx integration provided at this

https://github.com/analogdevicesinc/hdl/tree/main/projects/adrv9026/zcu102

Can you please provide me the link for no-OS version for this one. Thanks

Hi,

The ORx integration is in the main branch for both HDL and no-OS. In HDL you have to build one of these examples and in no-OS you have to choose the corresponding profile in the Makefile before building.

Best regards,
Andrei

Thanks for your response. In HDL example you mentioned above which is here

    hdl/projects/adrv9026/zcu102/system_project.tcl

Do these lines needed to be uncommented?

#   RX-OS disabled: make
#   RX-OS Non-LinkSharing:
#    - JESD204B: make ORX_ENABLE=1 RX_OS_JESD_M=4 RX_OS_JESD_L=2 RX_OS_JESD_S=1 RX_OS_JESD_NP=16 RX_JESD_M=4 RX_JESD_L=2
#    - JESD204C: make JESD_MODE=64B66B ORX_ENABLE=1 TX_LANE_RATE=16.22 RX_LANE_RATE=16.22 \
                 RX_OS_JESD_M=4 RX_OS_JESD_L=2 RX_OS_JESD_S=1 RX_OS_JESD_NP=16 RX_JESD_L=2

Hi,  I am using Vivado2024.2; Vitis2024.2 and working wit these

github.com/.../system_project.tcl

https://github.com/analogdevicesinc/noOS/blob/e6569fe15a623d3db97ee291bac93aa44b35b966/projects/adrv902x/Makefile#L6-L9

But I always get this error

build folder exists
/usr/bin/sh: line 1: xsct: command not found
make: *** [C:/no-OS/tools/scripts/xilinx.mk:192: xilinx_run] Error 127

I have tried everything and also followed similar problem faced by others who posted on this forum but not working.

Can you please help me in moving forward I am stuck

I'm not sure the no-OS will work with Vitis 2024.2. I would suggest using Vivado & Vitis 2023.2.

Regarding the xsct error, make sure to set the Vivado path before running make. Example:

export PATH=/<your_installation_path>/Xilinx/Vivado/<version>/bin:$PATH

On your suggestion: I uninstalled 2024.2 installed vitis 2023.2 previously hdl was successfully building but now it gives error at this stage

I am cloning this

git clone github.[View:~/.../hdl.git

I have attached the log file also. This has been painful and would appreciate help in making this work