2008-07-01 06:00:33 compile error:busybox_unstripped
kevin zhou (CHINA)
Message: 58153
Hi, All:
I am using BF561 Ez-kit.
Host PC: ubuntu 8.04
When I compile kernel under "uClinux-dist" folder, I encountered the following error:
AR shell/lib.a
LD sysklogd/built-in.o
CC sysklogd/klogd.o
CC sysklogd/logger.o
CC sysklogd/syslogd.o
AR sysklogd/lib.a
LD util-linux/built-in.o
CC util-linux/dmesg.o
CC util-linux/getopt.o
CC util-linux/hwclock.o
CC util-linux/losetup.o
CC util-linux/mdev.o
CC util-linux/more.o
CC util-linux/mount.o
CC util-linux/umount.o
AR util-linux/lib.a
LINK busybox_unstripped
bfin-uclinux-strip: busybox_unstripped: File format not recognized
make[3]: Leaving directory `../uClinux-dist/user/busybox'
make[2]: Leaving directory `../uClinux-dist/user'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `../uClinux-dist/user
Can you help me to figure out why, how to deal with it?
Thanks very much!
QuoteReplyEditDelete
2008-07-01 07:12:08 Re: compile error:busybox_unstripped
Mike Frysinger (UNITED STATES)
Message: 58155
that isnt an error, it's a warning. things are built in parallel so you didnt include the real error message.
run `make single` to find out the real problem.
QuoteReplyEditDelete
2008-07-02 03:52:14 Re: compile error:busybox_unstripped
kevin zhou (CHINA)
Message: 58182
Ok.
I have solved the problem, many thanks for your suggestion.
QuoteReplyEditDelete
2009-03-23 22:00:36 Re: compile error:busybox_unstripped
uni chen (CHINA)
Message: 71397
Hi Kevin,
I met the same problem...
And I also found there is no "mkfs.jffs2" so I couldn't get my rootfs.jffs2....
Would you please tell me how to solve this problem?
Thanks a lot!
QuoteReplyEditDelete
2009-03-23 22:02:29 Re: compile error:busybox_unstripped
uni chen (CHINA)
Message: 71398
By the way. my CPU is bf536, porting from bf537_stamp....
I used the R1.5RC3, the latest release version.
QuoteReplyEditDelete
2009-03-24 09:06:08 Re: compile error:busybox_unstripped
Robin Getz (UNITED STATES)
Message: 71447
Uni:
You will get a better response if you start a new thread - new issue == new thread. The existing one is almost a year old.
-Robin