2008-10-15 09:35:41     PATA on the BF-548

Document created by Aaronwu Employee on Aug 8, 2013
Version 1Show Document
  • View in full screen mode

2008-10-15 09:35:41     PATA on the BF-548

Vladimir Davydov (BELARUS)

Message: 63719    Hi! I'm working with BF-548 EZ-KIT Lite. The ATAPI is working fine. But on the target device a hard drive will be connected to the alternate ATAPI interface (PPI0). I have read in the Hardware References that the Port F can alternatively provide the ATAPI data signals if not multiplexed with the asynchronous bus. Does the linux kernel driver (pata_bf54x) support this case? I have analyzed the source code of the driver and didn't found where the PORTF_MUX sets to proper values to route ATAPI data and signals to alternate homes. Thanks, Vladimir

QuoteReplyEditDelete

 

 

2008-10-15 17:33:51     Re: PATA on the BF-548

Robin Getz (UNITED STATES)

Message: 63727   

 

Vladimir:

 

They might not be - but it should be considered a bug - we test / verify on hardware we have, and it is difficult sometimes to verify on posibilities...

 

If you are going to have hardware - we can help make it work.

 

-Robin

QuoteReplyEditDelete

 

 

2008-10-16 08:45:51     Re: PATA on the BF-548

Vladimir Davydov (BELARUS)

Message: 63790    Thank you, Robin. In this case first engineering samples of our device will provide both interfaces to ATAPI (standard and alternate). We will check the driver and add proper portmux setup if it will not work with alternate interface.

QuoteReplyEditDelete

 

 

2008-10-19 05:15:14     Re: PATA on the BF-548

Mike Frysinger (UNITED STATES)

Message: 63912   

 

you should look at how the BF52x handles the SPORT0 pins going on different PORTs ... it isnt done in drivers, it's done in the Kconfig/headers

Attachments

    Outcomes