Post Go back to editing

Guidance Required for Selecting Optimal Respiration Path in ADAS1000

Category: Hardware
Product Number: ADAS1000

Dear Team,

We have designed a PCB with ADAS1000 AFE for our patient monitor application.
For that we took ADAS1000SDZ EVK as a reference, in evaluation schematics six different respiration path options are available, as listed below. Among these, we require your guidance in selecting the most efficient respiration path for measuring the accurate respiration:

Path 1: Respiration drive using internal capacitor, respiration measurement using ECG path
Path 2: Respiration drive using internal capacitor, respiration measurement using ECG paths via the EXT_RESP path
Path 3: Respiration drive using internal capacitor, respiration measurement via EXT_RESP path
Path 4: Respiration drive using external capacitor, respiration measurement using ECG paths
Path 5: Respiration drive using external capacitor, respiration measurement using ECG paths via the EXT_RESP path
Path 6: Respiration drive using external capacitor, respiration measurement with external amplifier

We have tested Path 1 on the evaluation board, and it is working well. Our objective is to achieve efficient respiration output during cautery(ESD) on the PCB we have designed, which includes all respiration path options excluding Path 3. Could you please advise which path would be preferable for this requirement? 

Kindly suggest the most suitable option among the remaining four respiration paths.



Regards,
Saikrishna
Lead Engineer - R&D
BPL Medical Technologies Pvt Ltd

  • Hi  ,

    Could you please help look into this query?

    Thanks,
    Francis

  • Hi,

    Path 5 has the potential to provide the best performance. Using external capacitors (RESPDAC pins) allows the user to minimize the impedance in the excitation path. As a result higher excitation currents will flow and a higher signal will be measured for a given Rbody impedance. Using the EXT_RESP pins to sense the respiration signal allows the user to bypass any low pass filters the ECG pins may feature which could attenuate the excitation carrier frequency (which is in the 50-56kHz range). Electrosurgery interference supression (ESIS) filters tend to be quite aggressive and can still attenuate signals in the 50-56kHz range.

    All other methods are also valid but may limit the performance when cables with defib protection resistance and/or long cables with high capacitance to ground/shield are used. Or if the ESIS filters attenuate the respiration signal.

    Best regards

      Roberto

Before You Switch


Switching languages will make ADI Explorer unavailable. Resume your session by switching back to English and reopening ADI Explorer.