Post Go back to editing

Asymmetric split supply operation

Thread Summary

The user inquires about using an asymmetric split supply (AVdd = 2.6V, AVss = -1V) for measuring a unipolar signal slightly below ground (-200 mV). The final answer confirms this setup is valid as long as the absolute maximum ratings are not exceeded. The user also confirms that referencing the external reference to AVss (-1V) is feasible, allowing a valid AIN range of -0.9V to 2.5V with buffered inputs and a gain of 1.
AI Generated Content
Category: Hardware
Product Number: AD7124-4

Is it ok to use an asymmetric split supply for AVdd and AVss?  I would like to measure a unipolar signal with AIN- that is slightly below ground (about -200 mV at most).  To maximize the resolution of my external 2.5 volt reference I would like to reference it to ground and then set AVss to -1V and AVdd to 2.6V.  I've tried out this setup in the virtual eval tool and it doesn't complain but I wanted to make sure this is a valid setup because the datasheet only talks about a symmetrical split supply of +/- 1.8V.

If there is a better solution to reading slightly negative voltages that doesn't require numerous external components I would be open to that as well.  The reason the voltage AIN- is slightly negative sometimes is that I'm measuring the output of multiple high current power supplies deferentially and the ADC ground is slightly up stream of the power supply return connection.  Keeping the ADC ground at the same potential as the power supply return might be possible but would complicate the wiring harness which I would like to avoid.

  • Hi  ,

    Yes, it is possible to use an asymmetrical split supply operation as long as AVdd and AVss do not exceed the absolute maximum ratings specified on page 14 of the datasheet, and your setup meets this condition.

    We will look into a better solution for reading slightly negative voltage and get back to you.

    Thanks.

    Regards,
    Francis

  • Thanks, I think the asymmetric power rails will work nicely for my application then. 

    I was also reading a bit more about the reference voltage and now I don't really see a disadvantage to referencing it to AVSS at -1V instead of ground.  If I read the datasheet correctly then I can have any AIN+ to AIN- differential voltage so long as the magnitude is 2.5V or less(with reference buffers disabled) and the absolute Ain voltages are within limits (and since I am using unipolar polarity AIN+ must be >= AIN-).  In my case I have both AIN inputs buffered with a gain of 1 so my valiide range is AVSS+0.1V to AVDD-0.1V, in my case that would be -.9V to 2.5V.  The upside to referencing the voltage reference to AVSS is that the internal reference does the same so I could potentially remove the external reference if the performance of the internal is sufficient.

    Can you confirm that my understanding is correct?

  • Hi  ,

    Yes, the valid AIN range is -0.9V to 2.5V with the parameters you mentioned for gain and buffered AIN as stated in the datasheet. Your understanding is correct as well about the internal/external reference.

    Thanks,
    Francis