Post Go back to editing

AD7134 Eval Board Common Mode

Category: Hardware
Product Number: AD7134

Hi,

I connected a self designed sensor board to the EVAL-AD7134FMCZ. Therefore I removed Device 0 from the eval-board and connected serial+data lines from my board to the eval-board. 

I can see that communication via the AD7134 Evaluation Software is working well, as i could sample a sinusoidal signal with the correct frequency (but somehow shifted to negative range of the y-axis). My problem seems to be related to the applied common mode voltage.

Below you can see my input circuitry, using the recommendet LTC6363-1 from the datasheet. The VCM signal applies the VCM=VREF/2=2.048V to the LTC6363's output voltage that is directly connected to the AD7134's AIN0+ (connected to AIN1+) and AIN0- (connected to AIN1-) using 2:1 channel averaging.

So, if I apply a fully differential DC voltage of 1V to the input of LTC6363, I can measure a differential voltage of 1V directly of the input of the AD7134. I also measure 2.548V at AIN0+ and 1.548V at AIN0-, both measured against AGND. This all seems to be fine.

But with the AD7134 Evaluation Software do not get the correct result. It somehow measures -1.81V when I apply 1V to the LTC6363-1 input.

When I apply the same DC voltage of 1V to the input of Device 1 (also using channel averaging), I can measure the correct result in the Evaluation Software (without using a fully differential amplifier inbetween). I checked the registers and they are the same for both devices.

Is there the possibility that the wrong measurement is related to the fully differential amplifier? Is there a problem with the AD7134 Evaluation SW when using the fully differential amplifier because of VCM voltage?

As I can see in the schematics for Device 1, the VCOM_2 is not applied to the voltage that is applied to connector P9 (AIN0+_INP_2 and AIN0-_INP_2). This is the only difference that I can see in the two setups (my sensor vs. Device 1 on eval-board)

See result on Device 1 (left, CH4) and result of my sensor (right, CH0)

Best Regards, David

Parents
  • Hi  ,

    Can you help advise/measure on the ADC supplies you are using in your sensor board? (AVDD5, AVDD1V8, DVDD5, DVDD1V8, REFIN) Are you using the same supplies from the EVB?

    Kindly clarify also what you mean that the VCOM_2 is not applied to the voltage in P9.

    As I can see in the schematics for Device 1, the VCOM_2 is not applied to the voltage that is applied to connector P9 (AIN0+_INP_2 and AIN0-_INP_2).

    Thanks,
    Janine

Reply
  • Hi  ,

    Can you help advise/measure on the ADC supplies you are using in your sensor board? (AVDD5, AVDD1V8, DVDD5, DVDD1V8, REFIN) Are you using the same supplies from the EVB?

    Kindly clarify also what you mean that the VCOM_2 is not applied to the voltage in P9.

    As I can see in the schematics for Device 1, the VCOM_2 is not applied to the voltage that is applied to connector P9 (AIN0+_INP_2 and AIN0-_INP_2).

    Thanks,
    Janine

Children
  • Hi  ,

    I am not using the same supplies from the EVB. As want to have a fully differential high voltage measurement, the HV side is isolated from the LV side. So, serial and data lines on HV side act on 1V8 level and also the digital isolated signal behave on 1V8 level. My supply voltages on HV side (directly at the ADC) seem to be correct:

    AVDD5 = 5.093V

    AVDD1V8 = 1.774V

    DVDD5 = 5.111V

    DVDD1V8= 1.785

    REFIN = 4.096V (REFCAP = 4.023V)

    What I meant with

    "As I can see in the schematics for Device 1, the VCOM_2 is not applied to the voltage that is applied to connector P9 (AIN0+_INP_2 and AIN0-_INP_2)."

    is that with the standard configuration on the EVB, there is no common mode voltage applied to the input signal.

  • Hi  ,

    When you applied the input to Device 1, did you use P7/J2+J6? or P9?

    You should be able to measure the VCOM_2 in pin 4 of P9.

    Would it be possible for you to apply the input to TP18 and TP19 instead? Can you also try probing DOUT?

    Thanks,
    Janine