AD5941
Recommended for New Designs
The AD5940 and AD5941 are high precision, low power analog front ends (AFEs) designed for portable applications that require high precision, electrochemical...
Datasheet
AD5941 on Analog.com
AD5940
Recommended for New Designs
The AD5940 and AD5941 are high precision, low power analog front ends (AFEs) designed for portable applications that require high precision, electrochemical...
Datasheet
AD5940 on Analog.com
ADUCM355
Recommended for New Designs
The ADuCM355 is an on-chip system that controls and measures electrochemical sensors and biosensors. The ADuCM355 is an ultralow power, mixed-signal microcontroller...
Datasheet
ADUCM355 on Analog.com
Hi, I'm looking to measure open-circuit current noise for EIS using the AD5941. Can you please confirm if the following methods are correct?
My protocol is to run a two-wire setup for a known resistor across SE, RE, and CE.
I run an EIS measurement at a set frequency and set RTIA, and then obtain the DFT values of that known resistor. From there, I use the following equation:
Is that equation correct for calculating the I_RMS using the DFT? I know that I don't need to measure RCAL since I'm only measuring current, but I wanted to ask to make sure.
Lastly, is the theoretical value for the I_RMS equivalent to the AC Voltage RMS divided by the sum of the known resistor and the 100 Ohms in series with SE?
Thank you!
Hi,
Since you are measuring only current,
if using EIS example code in GitHub,
1) you may remove below sections:
- /* RLOAD Measurement */
- /* RCAL Measurement */
inside measure sequence (AppIMPSeqMeasureGen()).
2) To reduce complexity, you may not enable DFT block in measure sequence:
AD5940_AFECtrlS(AFECTRL_ADCCNV|AFECTRL_DFT, bTRUE); /* Start ADC convert and DFT */
3) You may just do data process as below. It returns current input from SE. (load includes the 100ohm resistor at SE)
static AD5940Err AppIMPDataProcess(int32_t * const pData, uint32_t *pDataCount)
{
uint32_t i, datacount;
datacount = *pDataCount;
float *pOut = (float *)pData;
for(i=0;i<datacount;i++)
{
pData[i] &= 0xffff;
pOut[i] = AppAMPCalcCurrent(pData[i]);
}
return AD5940ERR_OK;
}
Hi Akila,
Is this still accounting for the AC amplitude? If I understand correctly, I use the following method:
1. Apply AC signal at set frequency to two-electrode configuration
2. Poll the ADC register and NOT the DFT one
3. Use the Current and Voltage code from the Amperometry example
I also have a few questions about the amperometry example: ad5940-examples/examples/AD5940_Amperometric/Amperometric.c at master · analogdevicesinc/ad5940-examples (github.com)
AppAMPCalcVoltage uses a k-factor: 1.835/1.82 - what is the origin of these values?
It also uses a 1.8V Ref Voltage, what pin do I measure that from?
The RTIA magnitude it uses, in the EIS case, is this just the RTIA I set for that measurement?
From the current measurements, how would I obtain RMS from these values since I'm using an AC signal instead of the DC one used in Amperometry?
Thank you!
Is there a followup for this? Thank you!
Hi,
1) k-factor is required because factory calibration was done at 1.835V.
2) 1.8V Ref Voltage can be measured from VREF_1V82 pin.
3) Could you please clarify? In EIS code, RTIA value is not used for impedance calculation. It uses ratiometric calculation. ( Rz = (1/DftRzRload - 1/DftRload)*DftRcal*RCAL)
4) You may use the statistics block inside AD5940 to calculate mean or variance of measured data.
Kindly refer to AD5940_StatisticCfgS(&stat_cfg) function in AD5940.c.
For using statistics block, fifo source must to set to FIFOSRC_VAR or FIFOSRC_MEAN.
AppAMPCalcCurrent(), to convert to voltage and current, uses the RTIA in its function.
I am asking if this is the same RTIA I set when I measure the current from the ADC?
Hi Akila, I notice the link refers to the LPRTIA. Since I'm using the HS Loop for EIS, i wanted to quantify the current using the HS Loop. Is the process the same? Is there a calibration function for the HSRTIA or can I simply use the actual gain value of the RTIA (i.e. HSRTIA_40K = 40,000 Ohms) when calculating the current.
I currently have it set to apply a sinusoid voltage across a two-electrode configuration and I poll the ADC (i.e. ADCCNV) results through the SINC3 filter (i.e. AFE_ReadResult(AFERESULT_SINC3) since that is recommended to always be enabled. Or should I poll the SINC2 Notch as per the Amperometric code if I want to measure current noise?
Hi,
You may use AD5940_HSRtiaCal() function defined in AD5940.c
Sinc3 filter is used to reduce noise.
Hence, to measure current noise, you may bypass filters as below:
adc_filter.BpNotch = bTRUE;
adc_filter.BpSinc3 = bTRUE;
adc_filter.Sinc2NotchEnable = bTRUE
Hi Akila,
Thanks for the response!
Will polling the SINC3 filter after I bypass it give me the results directly from the ADC? I can't find an AFERESULT_ADC similar to AFERESULT_SINC3 and AFERESULT_SINC2NOTCH.
Also, do you have any recommendations for the filter settings for the calibration? For reference, here are the frequencies I'm looking to measure noise at (using 10 mV sinusoid excitation with a 1.1V bias):
1. 200 kHz
2. 100 kHz
3. 10 kHz
4. 1000 Hz
5. 100 Hz
6. 10 Hz
7. 1 Hz
8. 0.1 Hz
Thank you!
Hi Akila,
Sorry about the inconvenience, but I wanted to ask about the open-circuit noise (measuring current without an electrochemical cell). This means applying a 0V signal and then reading the results through the ADC via the SE0 pin.
What settings need to be enabled / disabled such that I can achieve this 0V signal across SE0, RE0, and CE0? I ask because I know that the HSDAC has a standard 1.1V bias when not using the LPDAC, so I'm not too sure how to go about this.
Hi,
Yes. After bypassing Sinc3 filter, calling AD5940_ReadAfeResult() reads directly from ADCDAT register.
You may refer to AD5940_GetFreqParameters() function in defined in AD5940.c for calibration filter settings w.r.t. frequency.
Hi,
Yes. After bypassing Sinc3 filter, calling AD5940_ReadAfeResult() reads directly from ADCDAT register.
You may refer to AD5940_GetFreqParameters() function in defined in AD5940.c for calibration filter settings w.r.t. frequency.