AD7746 liquid level monitoring

 Equation is already mentioned in Figure 5 of the above link. That will help you to design the ruler.

For extending the capacity level, you need to extend the capacitance range beyond what the device is capable of. Please refer to AN-1585 (Rev. A) (analog.com). 

thanks vsethia, for the physical size of ruler, I can refer to Figure 5, is there any requirement about the grounding / shielding?

Please refer to some of the PCB design guidelines mentioned at the link 

Capacitance Sensors for Human Interfaces to Electronic Equipment | Analog Devices

AN-854 Sensor PCB Design Guidelines for the AD7142 and AD7143 Capacitance-to-Digital Converters Application Note (Rev. A) (analog.com)

You need to apply grounding and shielding around the sensor pads on layers below/above. 

two more questions:

1) If following below setup, I still have no idea how to add shielding, is that only need a ground plate cover all electrodes and connect it to AGND of EVB-AD7746EBZ? 4 electrodes are connecting to two CDC (CIN1 / CIN2 / CEXCA / CEXCB).

2) As CEXCA and CEXCB are connected to two of electrodes for compensation, does it mean no way to extend the capacity level? Because according to the App Note AN-1585, the range extension circuit is connecting to EXCA and EXCB, please advise.

Thanks and regards,

Kevin

You can use additional CDC to get the EXC signals.

Other option is to use the same EXCA+EXCB for both CIN1 and CIN2.

Nothing restricts you from experimenting with the choices that you have.

EXCA and EXCB are generated by the same source and in sync/out of sync with small phase error caused due to internal buffer delays.

Refer to Figure 6 in the link Liquid Level Sensing Using Capacitive-to-Digital Converters | Analog Devices for grounding.

thanks vesthia, we've got other questions about CAPDAC.

Refer to Figure 29 in datasheet, Output Data approximately equal to (Cx - CAPDAC(+))

If I connect CIN(+) only and set CAPDIFF set to 0, then:

Q1) does CAPDAC(+) equal to CAPDAC A in evaluation software?

Q2) if so, I don't why after changing CAPDAC A value, the output data seems not followed the equation, below is the test data. I would expect Output Data + DAC A should be approximately equal to the output without adding CAPDAC, but the result is a bit off to my target when CAPDAC is at low value and off a lot when CAPDAC is higher, do you know why? 

Thanks and regards,

Kevin

CAPDAC is like a negative offset to the external capacitive sensor.  So, instead of adding, you need to subtract the CAPDAC value as mentioned in the equation.

However, in the snapshot, you have not enabled any of the CAPDACs, and so its effects are not visible on the output.

Also, in the above results, you have not mentioned what external capacitive values you have used. Further you need to do offset and gain calibration as per your system requirements.

If I just connect Cx to CIN(+), still need to subtract the CAPDAC CIN(-)?

During testing, I have enabled the CAPDACs.

The data is getting from a small plastic cup and fill in water as a external capacitor (see below photo), and we use a copper paper to cover it as shielding.

Therefore, if Data = ( (Cx - CAPDAC (+) ) - (Cy - CAPDAC(-) ) ), I am assuming Cy and CAPDAC(-) should be zero, then Data = Cx - CAPDAC(+), refer to the test result

the output data of CIN1(+) is 1.055pF and CAPDAC is off, so the Cx should be 1.055pF, am I correct? 

If so, then enable CAPDAC and set to 1, the output data is 0.877pF, apply to the equation, 0.877 = Cx - (0.1328), Cx is 1.0098pF now, why it is not close to 1.055pF? Anything I missed or misunderstanding something?

Thanks and regards,

Kevin

If I just connect Cx to CIN(+), still need to subtract the CAPDAC CIN(-)?

During testing, I have enabled the CAPDACs.

The data is getting from a small plastic cup and fill in water as a external capacitor (see below photo), and we use a copper paper to cover it as shielding.

Therefore, if Data = ( (Cx - CAPDAC (+) ) - (Cy - CAPDAC(-) ) ), I am assuming Cy and CAPDAC(-) should be zero, then Data = Cx - CAPDAC(+), refer to the test result

the output data of CIN1(+) is 1.055pF and CAPDAC is off, so the Cx should be 1.055pF, am I correct? 

If so, then enable CAPDAC and set to 1, the output data is 0.877pF, apply to the equation, 0.877 = Cx - (0.1328), Cx is 1.0098pF now, why it is not close to 1.055pF? Anything I missed or misunderstanding something?

Thanks and regards,

Kevin