Post Go back to editing

AD9142A Internal NCO Poor Phase Noise

Thread Summary

The user observed degraded phase noise when using the AD9142A's internal NCO compared to a 100MHz tone generated externally. The support engineer explained that the NCO introduces deterministic spurs and artifacts, which appear as increased phase noise, and suggested using higher interpolation (4x or 8x) to reduce these artifacts. The user confirmed the observed behavior matched the provided data but sought further clarification on the NCO's operation and the impact of the interpolation factor.
AI Generated Content
Category: Hardware
Product Number: AD9142A

Hello,

I have been testing phase noise on the AD9142A for use in a noise critical application.

I get adequate results when generating a 100MHz tone using the DPG Lite pattern generator + SDP-H1 development board interfaced to the AD9142A...

But if I enable the AD9142A internal NCO the phase noise degrades substantially. 

To do a one-to-one comparison I have two test configurations (both via the SDP-H1 running DPG Lite pattern to AD9142A):

  1. 100MHz pattern -> SDP-H1 -> LVDS -> AD9142A (no internal NCO)
  2. Static DC level -> SDP-H1 -> LVDS -> AD9142A with internal NCO at 100MHz

The results are as follows:



Is this expected behavior? Any way to mitigate?

  • Hi  ,

    Thank you for using AD9142A.

    Kindly allow us some time to review your concern, and we will provide an update accordingly.

    Thanks and kind regards,

    Alex

  • Thanks! Let me know if any additional information on our setup is needed... I am getting very repeatable results that look nearly identical to my original post (no NCO -> great phase noise ... with NCO --> much worse).

  • Hello, just pinging to see if there is any update on this inquiry? Thanks

  • Hi  ,

    Apologies for the late response.

    The behavior you’re seeing is normal and commonly observed when comparing a baseband tone to one generated by the internal NCO in high-speed DACs like the AD9142A.  Enabling the NCO introduces extra digital processing stages (as per Figure 47 of rev B datasheet) that create spurs and artifacts that can look like degraded phase noise.

    To reduce phase noise using NCO, use high interpolation (4x or 8x) to move images farther away and smooths ripple.  Slightly adjust the output frequency, as certain ratios produce more truncation spurs.  Below are results for lower and higher interpolation settings.

    Thanks and kind regards,

    Alex

  • Alex,

    Okay so the data you show maps to what we are seeing as well... 

    I still don't understand why this is expected behavior nor why the interpolation factor would impact the phase noise introduced by the NCO...

    My understanding is that the NCO operates at full FDAC rate and interpolation factor should only effect the input data up conversion and filtering prior to being mixed with the NCO...

    So with a DC input... It seems like the NCO performance (theoretically) be independent of the interpolation factor...

    Eric

  • Hi  ,

    You’re correct, the NCO runs at the DAC rate, so random phase noise should not depend on interpolation. The difference you see is mostly deterministic spurs, not true noise.  
    When you turn on the NCO, extra digital blocks like the phase accumulator, mixer, and rounding come into play. These don’t add random phase noise, but they create spurs and images. On a spectrum analyzer with wide RBW, those spurs look like a higher noise floor. Interpolation doesn’t change the NCO’s true phase noise, but it changes internal scaling and filter behavior, which shifts spur positions and levels.  The difference you see is not true phase noise growth, but digital artifacts that appear like it.
    Thanks and kind regards,
    Alex
  • Okay... So we have in-house NCO solutions that do not introduce artifacts like this ... So this seems like a design issue within the AD9142A.

    And this amount of spurs across the entire close-in phase noise spectrum is likely unacceptable for our application.

    I would like to say we can just run without the internal NCO and run only at 2x interpolation for a maximum output of roughly 460MHz... But that is fairly limited versus the advertised "1600MSPS" (~800MHz 1st Nyquist).

    2x interpolation -> FDAC max = 1150MSPS -> 2x HB filter -> 0.4x BW ~ 460MHz.

    This does seem like a major limitation of the part though... Recommend that the ADI team considers adding this limitation into the datasheet to inform future customers.

Before You Switch


Switching languages will make ADI Explorer unavailable. Resume your session by switching back to English and reopening ADI Explorer.