Post Go back to editing

AD9776A Driving the REF Clock Input

Thread Summary

The user is concerned about the compatibility of LVDS driver output levels with the AD9776A's REFCLK input requirements. The final answer confirms that while LVDS levels are typically lower than the AD9776A's minimum differential peak-to-peak voltage, the datasheet recommends using an LVDS driver with proper termination. The user clarifies that the datasheet suggests the configuration will work despite the voltage mismatch.
AI Generated Content
Category: Datasheet/Specs
Product Number: AD9776A

Hello,

I have a design that includes the AD9776A. Ref clock is driven by an LVDS driver chip. The output of the LVDS driver chip is ac coupled and then driven into a pair of 50 ohm resistors as figure 73 in the data sheet shows.  I am confused by the DAC CLOCK INPUT (REFCLK+, REFCLK−) specification on page 6 of the data sheet.  The DAC CLOCK INPUT (REFCLK+, REFCLK−) specification says the minimum differential peak to peak voltage is 400 mV, typical is 800 mV and max is 2000 mv.  

The specification for LVDS is min 200 mV, typical 350 mV and max is 450 mV.  The typical differential voltage for LVDS is 350 mV which is below the minimum differential voltage of the AD9776A.  It seems like sourcing the REF Clock using an LVDS driver may fail if the LVDS driver is providing a typical voltage of 350 mV or even worst if the driver shades more towards the minimum.  Am I interpreting the number incorrectly?

Would it make more sense to use two 60 ohm resistors instead of two 50 ohm resistors as shown in figure 73? This would bring the typical differential voltage to 420 mV (assuming the LVDS driver sources 3.5 mAmps).

It seems as though the differential voltage specification and the recommendation of using an LVDS driver are not compatible. Can you address this issue?

Thanks

  • Hi  ,

    Thank you for using AD9776A. 

    You are correct regarding the compatibility between the AD9776A's REFCLK input requirements and the voltage levels typically provided by standard LVDS levels.  This is actually noted on page 42 of the Rev. C datasheet under the section 'DRIVING THE REFCLK INPUT,' as shown below. While this termination method is standard for LVDS, it serves only to match impedance and does not increase the signal amplitude.  That’s why it might seem puzzling at first, but the datasheet recommends using an LVDS driver.

    To drive the REFCLK, please refer on application note below.  It reinforces the idea that LVDS is suitable for clock distribution, but termination and signal swing must be carefully managed to meet specific device requirements like those of the AD9776A.

    AN-1177: LVDS and M-LVDS Circuit Implementation Guide

    Thanks and kind regards,

    Alex

  • Thank you for the reply.  Just so I am clear about what you and the data sheet are saying.  The data sheet says that using an LVDS driver with the configuration shown in figure 73 is acceptable and will work even though the data sheet specifies that LVDS levels are outside of the specs for the REFCLK voltage swing.

    Thanks

    Bill

Before You Switch


Switching languages will make ADI Explorer unavailable. Resume your session by switching back to English and reopening ADI Explorer.