Post Go back to editing

AD9122 Evaluation Board Clock - sine wave clock input only?

Category: Hardware
Product Number: AD9122

Hi, 

the manual of the AD9122 Evaluation Board states that "A sinusoidal clock output level of 0 to 4dBm is optimal". This refers to the Clk-input pins of the AD9516, which are connected via a balun to the SMA-port J1:

If I want to use a DACClk of 800MHz, I primarily would have to apply an 800 MHz sine wave input on J1. But I only have a CMOS Clock signal available. Due to the Balun and its poor performance above 1 GHz (https://cdn.macom.com/datasheets/MABACT0043.pdf), I am not sure if it is a good idea to apply it on J1. I am using a custom controller board for the AD9122 Evaluation BoardMy questions are:

1.) Would you recommend applying a 800MHz square wave input on J1 (Clk-input)? I guess it would also be possible to provide a lower frequency signal and then use the PLL to generate 800MHz at the outputs. 

2.) Or is it better to apply the square wave on J14 (RefCKp) instead and not use J1 entirely? Even with a slower frequency to generate 800MHz via the internal PLL?

I know that Nr. 2 would result in a slightly worse Jitter performance, but this is OK in my case.

Thank you very much!

  • Hi  ,

    Thanks for your interest on AD9122.

    We will check your concern and provide update later.

    Thanks and kind regards,

    Alex

  • Hi  , 

    Thank you for your interest in AD9122. Using the REFCLK to generate the internal clock (i.e. using the internal PLL) results to a slightly lower performance than using direct DAC clocking (refer to the Typical Performance Characteristics on Page 11-16 of the datasheet). If for the AD9516-1, generating the clock to OUT6 (REFCLK_P/N) has a slighter worse performance than when generating the clock to OUT2 (DACCK_P/N) because of the higher additive jitter (275 fs rms with OUT6 LVDS than 225 fs rms with OUT2 LVPECL). 

    If the higher additive jitter is acceptable with your application, you can apply the clock signal from J1 then just configure the AD9516-1 to generate a clock output to OUT6 for REFCLK_P/N. 

    Best regards,
    Marco

  • Hi Marco,

    thank you for your answer. We will use the Out2 of the AD9516 to DACCK_P/N. 

    Please also answer my first question: When using the J1 (Clk-input of AD9516) for e.g. a 800MHz clock signal, would you recommend a square wave input? I am asking because of the poor performance of the balun (datasheet linked above) and we only have a square wave clock signal available. 

  • Hi  ,

    The key here is the slew rate of the clock signal. Generally, it's actually better to use a square wave clock input because it has a higher slew rate (higher rise/fall time resulting to a lower jitter).

    At higher frequencies however such as 800MHz, the clock signal can be sinusoidal so long as the amplitude is also high to retain the high slew rate. For a given frequency, a higher amplitude signal has a higher slew rate. The amplitude of a sinewave clock source is therefore of importance.

    Best regards,
    Marco