KCC's Quizzes AQQ304 - A pure logic
1. Quote of the month: "I am not lazy, I'm just in energy-saving mode" - unknown
2. Quiz AQQ304 about finding a pure logic puzzle
Mike is looking at Anne, but Anne is looking at Paul.
Mike is married, but Paul is not.
Question:
Is a married
View All
September Monthly Blog Quiz! Read the blog, take the quiz, and you could win a gift card
Quiz: How Well Do You Know Adaptive Power Switching?
Is your I/O module overheating? The AD74416H's Adaptive Power Switching (APS) can cut heat dissipation by up to 40% — but how well do you really understand how it works?
Read the blog first: Cooling
View All
AD9434
Recommended for New Designs
The AD9434 is a 12-bit monolithic sampling analog-to-digital converter (ADC) optimized for high performance, low power, and ease of use. The part operates...
Datasheet
AD9434 on Analog.com
I am submitting a corrected follow-up regarding my AD9434-FMC-500EBZ clock-path question. My previous comment referred to the AD9517 LVDS clock output path, but that was based on an incorrect interpretation of the schematic and should be disregarded.
I would now like to request confirmation specifically for the AD9517 PECL clock output path.
I am using an AD9434-FMC-500EBZ evaluation board, and I would like to use the onboard AD9517 clock path instead of the default direct clock path.
My goal is to use the onboard Y1 500 MHz oscillator as the AD9517 clock input, configure the AD9517 in distribution mode with a divide-by-2 setting, and drive the AD9434 CLK+ / CLK− inputs with a 250 MHz clock using the AD9517 PECL output path.
According to the schematic, my current understanding of the intended PECL clock path is:
Y1 500 MHz oscillator
→ R209 / T200 / OPT_CLK_P and OPT_CLK_N
→ C302 and C303 into the AD9517 CLK / CLK_N inputs
→ AD9517 divide-by-2 distribution mode
→ AD9517 OUT3 / OUT3_N PECL outputs
→ C304 and C305
→ AD9434 CLK+ / CLK− inputs
Based on this, I believe the required rework is:
* Install C302 and C303 = 0.1 uF
* Install C304 and C305 = 0.1 uF
* Install R208 = 200 ohm
* Remove C209 and C210
* Keep C300 and C301 unpopulated, because REFIN/REFIN_N are not used
* Keep C306 and C307 unpopulated, because the LVDS output path is not used
* Keep R311 unpopulated
* Keep R210 and R213 populated
* Keep R307 and R308 populated
I attached a photo of the actual PCB area near R208, C302, C303, C304, C305, C306, C307, C209, and C210.




For clarity, I numbered the 10 exposed capacitor pads in upper parts of the photo as follows:
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8
9 10
At the moment, the two populated capacitors appear to be connected as:
* 6 to 9
* 7 to 10
I believe these two populated parts are C209 and C210.
Could you please confirm the following?
1. Are the currently populated capacitors between pads 6–9 and 7–10 indeed C209 and C210?
2. For the AD9517 PECL clock path, should I remove the two capacitors currently installed at 6–9 and 7–10?
3. For C304 and C305, which pad pairs should be connected with 0.1 uF capacitors using the numbering above? My current understanding is:
* C304 = pads 5–6
* C305 = pads 7–8
Please confirm whether this is correct.
4. Are pads 1–2 and 3–4 for C306 and C307, and therefore not used for the PECL option?
5. For the AD9517 input clock path, C302 and C303 should also be populated with 0.1 uF capacitors to couple OPT_CLK_P / OPT_CLK_N into the AD9517 CLK / CLK_N inputs. Could you please confirm the physical pad locations of C302 and C303 in the attached photo, or indicate if they are outside the marked pad group?
6. Is R208 the resistor footprint directly above these capacitor pads in the photo, and should it be populated with 200 ohm for this AD9517 PECL clock option?
7. Should R311 remain unpopulated for the PECL option?
8. Are there any additional components that must be removed or populated for this AD9517 PECL clock configuration?
I want to avoid damaging the board by soldering the 0.1 uF capacitors to the wrong pads, so I would appreciate confirmation using the pad numbering above.
Thank you.
Thank you. I am also looking forward to a positive outcome.
Hi light2445,
My understanding base on the schematic that you shared is that you want to bypass the PLL and only use the clock divider of the AD9517. While this configuration might be okay, you need to ensure that your clock source has low jitter.
The User Guide shown in analog wiki website for AD9434 uses PLL as it helps improve the jitter performance of the external clock source.
If you want to proceed with bypassing the PLL, the following modifications should be done.
|
Install |
R208, C302, C303, C304, C305, R307, R308, C311 |
|
Remove |
C209, C210 |
To answer your questions:

For Reference: EVALUATING THE AD9434 ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERTER [Analog Devices Wiki]
Warm Regards,
Kim
Hi Kim,
Thank you for your detailed reply and for confirming the required rework.
I have one additional question regarding C311. You listed C311 as one of the components that should be installed for the AD9517 PECL clock configuration, but I would like to understand its function more clearly.
Could you please explain the role of C311 in this configuration?
From the schematic, C311 appears to be part of the AD9517 charge pump / loop filter network, rather than part of the direct PECL output clock path from OUT3 / OUT3_N to the AD9434 CLK+ / CLK− inputs.
Since my intended configuration is to bypass the PLL and use only the AD9517 divider / distribution path, I would like to confirm why C311 is still required.
I have attached two images:
1. A close-up photo of the actual PCB area around C311
2. A cropped schematic image of the charge pump filter section
If C311 must be installed, could you please confirm exactly how it should be connected on the actual PCB?
Based on the schematic, my understanding is that C311 should be installed as a 0.1 uF capacitor across the C311 footprint, between the LF node and the BYPASS_LDO node. However, I would appreciate confirmation using the attached PCB photo, because I want to avoid soldering it to the wrong pads.
Could you please indicate which two pads in the PCB photo correspond to C311?
Thank you again for your help.
Best regards,
light2445
Hi light2445,
Apologies for confusion. The C311 should not be populated because the clock configuration bypasses the PLL and does not require a charge pump. In addition, the R208 should only be populated with a 100 Ohm resistor for LVPECL configuration (see Figure 73 in the AD9517 data sheet).
Additional board modifications:

For proper configuration of registers when using an external clock source see AD9517 data sheet.
Warm Regards,
Kim
Hi Kim,
Thank you for the clarification. This helps a lot.
I understand now that C311 should not be populated because my intended configuration bypasses the AD9517 PLL and therefore does not use the charge pump / loop filter.
I also understand that, for the LVPECL configuration, R208 should be populated with 100 ohms, not 200 ohms, based on Figure 73 of the AD9517 data sheet.
I would like to confirm my understanding of the role of R208.
In my configuration, I plan to remove C209 and C210 to disconnect the original direct clock path, and then use the AD9517 OUT3 / OUT3_N LVPECL outputs through C304 and C305 to drive the AD9434 CLK+ / CLK− inputs.
Even after removing C209 and C210, R208 is still required because it acts as the 100 ohm differential termination at the AD9434 clock receiver side. My understanding is that this termination is used to match the differential clock line impedance and reduce reflections / ringing, helping preserve the clock edge quality.
Is this understanding correct?
So my current rework plan is:
already exists
- P1 jumper
- R209
Install:
- C302, C303
- C304, C305
- R208 = 100 ohm
Remove:
- C209, C210
Do not populate:
- C311
- C306, C307
- R311
Keep populated:
- R307, R308
Optional:
- Remove C202
- Change R206 and R207 to 50 ohm
Could you please confirm that this is the correct final rework plan for using the onboard Y1 500 MHz oscillator through the AD9517 LVPECL divider path to generate a 250 MHz clock for the AD9434?
Thank you again for your help.
Best regards,
light2445