Post Go back to editing

MAX30009 layout

Thread Summary

The user inquired about the aggressive copper removal strategy in the inner layers of the MAX30009 EVB layout, particularly noting the large multi-layer cutout region. The final answer directed the user to a forum thread for detailed discussion, which likely addresses the design intent to minimize parasitic capacitance, leakage, or substrate coupling at the bioimpedance inputs. The user was advised to review the forum for critical design elements to preserve in custom designs.
AI Generated Content
Category: Hardware
Product Number: MAX30009

I’m reviewing the MAX30009 EVB layout and noticed an aggressive copper removal strategy in the inner layers.

From Layer 2 onward, copper is only kept near the input area. Layer 3 has even larger clearances, and on Layer 4 there is almost no copper pour at all except for signal routing, creating a large multi-layer cutout region.

From a mixed-signal / low-level analog perspective, removing reference planes usually hurts return paths and noise immunity, so I’m curious about the design intent here.

Is this mainly to reduce parasitic capacitance, leakage, or substrate coupling at the bioimpedance inputs? Or is this EVB layout optimized for characterization rather than production?

Which parts of this approach are critical to preserve, and which could be relaxed in a custom design?