Post Go back to editing

AD9518-3, Phase noise due to two Ref clocks.

Thread Summary

The user is experiencing phase noise sidebands on a 1GHz output from the AD9518-3 when using two single-ended reference clocks (REF1 and REF2) with a small frequency difference. The final answer suggests that bond-wire coupling is the cause and recommends using series resistors or an external 2:1 mux to reduce the signal levels and minimize coupling. Proper PCB routing and impedance matching are also emphasized as critical for reducing phase noise.
AI Generated Content

Hi,

I'm using the AD9518-3 to generate a 1GHz clock for my DDS.

I provide REF1 in the form of a 10MHz TCXO, single ended.

The AD9518-3 produces beautiful 1GHz outputs. The phase noise is better than my portable HP spectrum

analyzer can measure. Nice! That's great! For this test, REF1 is the only clock connected.

REF2 will be an additional, external clock for this subsystem. When I keep REF1 connected

and then connect REF2, I see phase noise sidebands on my 1GHz signal at twice

the difference frequency of REF1 and REF2.

E.g., REF1 = 10MHz, REF2 = 9.997 MHz, I see sidebands on the 1GHz output

at 6kHz, 12kHz, 18kHz,etc. The first sideband is -30dBc! Wow! Not good!

Note that I see the same effect when I lock to REF2, rather than REF1.

Can't this chip run with 2 single-ended clocks connected without there being cross-talk phase noise?

Thanks,

David

Parents
  • Hi David,

    > Are you saying that applying 2 reference clocks to the AD9518

    > produces no excess phase noise on a "perfect" PCB?

    No. Of course not. The "perfect" PCB would have all differential clocks or tons of room to isolate the SE clocks. For the AD9518, ideally, we would have two differential inputs, but we didn't have enough pins, and the target market for the part was primarily interested in having only one differential input. Unfortunately, these are the trade-offs we had to make with the part.

    > The clocks are widely separated until they meet at the chip. Note that REF1 and REF2 are *adjacent* on the chip.

    > I have tried turning off the unused reference input. I still see excess phase noise.

    You're seeing bond-wire coupling.

    > You suggested reducing the signal levels. These are CMOS logic levels. How should they be reduced?

    Do you have any place for series resistors?

    You could put a "dumb" 2:1 mux in front of our part, but to be honest, I've seen cases where even their performance is underwhelming.

    -Paul Kern

Reply
  • Hi David,

    > Are you saying that applying 2 reference clocks to the AD9518

    > produces no excess phase noise on a "perfect" PCB?

    No. Of course not. The "perfect" PCB would have all differential clocks or tons of room to isolate the SE clocks. For the AD9518, ideally, we would have two differential inputs, but we didn't have enough pins, and the target market for the part was primarily interested in having only one differential input. Unfortunately, these are the trade-offs we had to make with the part.

    > The clocks are widely separated until they meet at the chip. Note that REF1 and REF2 are *adjacent* on the chip.

    > I have tried turning off the unused reference input. I still see excess phase noise.

    You're seeing bond-wire coupling.

    > You suggested reducing the signal levels. These are CMOS logic levels. How should they be reduced?

    Do you have any place for series resistors?

    You could put a "dumb" 2:1 mux in front of our part, but to be honest, I've seen cases where even their performance is underwhelming.

    -Paul Kern

Children
No Data