AD9517-0
Recommended for New Designs
The AD9517-01 provides a multi-output clock distribution function with subpicosecond jitter performance, along with an on-chip PLL and VCO. The on-chip...
Datasheet
AD9517-0 on Analog.com
Hello everyone:
I am using one AD9517-0 LVPECL output to drive a fanout buffer to convert the signal to two LDVS signals.
In the AD9517-0 datasheet I can see this figure to interface LVPECL stages:
On the other hand, in the datasheet of the fanout buffer, I can see this other configuration:
My dessign follows the AD recomendation (first schematic) and incorporates R1 to R4 of the second schematic.
Question: Should I keep the 100 Ohn resistor at the imput of the receiver (as proposed in the AD schematic)?
Thanks in advance
Regards
GuiX
Dear Guix,
In the first drawing, we're assuming that the input receiver is providing its own DC biasing. Yes. you can to keep the 100 ohms across the differential pair.
In the 2nd drawing, the Thevenin equivalent termination not only accomplishes impedance matching, but also DC-biases the input.
However, if you want to use the LVPECL outputs on the AD9517 to drive LVDS inputs, You can do that by powering VS_LVPECL at 2.5V, and programming the amplitude bits to the min output amplitude. This will make the AD9517 LVPECL drivers compatible with LVDS in terms of amplitude and common mode voltage.
-Paul
Dear Guix,
In the first drawing, we're assuming that the input receiver is providing its own DC biasing. Yes. you can to keep the 100 ohms across the differential pair.
In the 2nd drawing, the Thevenin equivalent termination not only accomplishes impedance matching, but also DC-biases the input.
However, if you want to use the LVPECL outputs on the AD9517 to drive LVDS inputs, You can do that by powering VS_LVPECL at 2.5V, and programming the amplitude bits to the min output amplitude. This will make the AD9517 LVPECL drivers compatible with LVDS in terms of amplitude and common mode voltage.
-Paul