Post Go back to editing

compare noise ADA4177 and AD8624 in a simple circuit Input in positive op-amp input - Something wrong in model.

Category: Datasheet/Specs
Product Number: ADA4177-4

ADA4177 noise model does not agree with datasheet at least in range 0.1Hz to 50HZ . A simple comparison with AD8624 will show it. R values can be lowered to decrease thermal noise, if RC

product is constant. Even more in datasheet peak noise 0.1-10Hz is very low and not agree with calculations of Ltspice ( notice also that spice computes rms value not peak, as I know)

Me and my students try to design a special biosensor. Signal is in the range of mHz to some Hz and amplitude of uV,  so is very important the noise, also protection is important.

Please help us, seams to be a better selection according to datasheet but in Ltspice is worst. What is true? Or another suggestion will be helpful.

Thanks you, in advance

K. Politopoulos 

 5824.noise-test.asc

Thread Notes

  • Hi  ,

    Good day. We will try to look into the noise model of the part. I just had some questions regarding your inquiry:

    • What schematic did you use to measure the part's 0.1 to 10 Hz noise? 
    • What was your measured value? 

    Regards,
    Gilbeys

  • Hi

    I have uploaded it as file 4213.noise-test.asc  .

    It is very simple series rc in negative input connected to ground  plus parallel rc in feedback. Input in positive input of op-amp and gain almost 40. The real circuit is more complicate but you can see the noise in this simple circuit. It is not exactly a band pass filter but  you can format the rc values to to create a simple band pass in the range 0.1Hz to 30Hz.. Look at output noise.

    In datasheet p-p noise in ADA4177 noise is a little less than AD8624. In calculations (ltspice) noise near 0.1Hz  to 1Hz  with ADA4177 we have huge increase (of course 1/f noise). On the other hand series rc decreases the gain. So,  some cancellation of 1/f noise  is expected at output. This behavior (cancellation) is calculated in Ltspice if replace ADA4177 with AD8624.

    So what is true?

    Thank you for the quick answer

    K. Politopoulos

  • Hi  ,

    Good day. As verified, there was a slight discrepancy with the ADA4177 noise model as compared to the datasheet while the AD8624 noise model was indeed modeled correctly. I'll try to share this with the team for review. Thank you.


    Regards,

    Gilbeys