Post Go back to editing

AD8253 excessive bias current

Using AD8253 in classic scope-type DAQ front end. Both inputs have 1 Mohm to ground. In an AC-coupled mode, the amp Ib develops offset voltage across the input resistor. Data sheet specs indicate 5 nA typical, 50 nA max over temp, further supported by Figures 8, 9, 18 and 19. I am seeing consistent 30-50 nA = 30-50 mV on tens of samples with all my other circuitry isolated. Any hints?

Parents
  • Emman,

    Thanks for the quick response. Attached is my application circuit. It is

    a ruggedized 4-channel 1 MS/s 18-bit DAQ front end that supports

    voltage, DC Bridge, thermocouple and IEPE inputs. I literally evaluated

    every PGA on earth for this app and I am very happy with the size,

    bandwidth, noise and precision. However I am seeing an unexpectedly

    large offset voltage. For testing I have removed the clamp diodes D5/D6,

    solid-state relays K1/K2, analog switches AK4, and shunt cal resistor

    R129, leaving U32 inputs open. I added 1Mohm film resistors directly

    from pin 1 to AGND and pin 10 to AGND to minimize the possibility of PCB

    leakage. Thus the AD8253 U32 is presently seeing only 1Mohm from each

    input to GND and a quarter-inch of open PCB trace. The filtered +/-7V

    rails come from local LTC LTM8022 micromodules, are clean (few mV

    wideband noise) and stiff. I am using a Gain of 1, although other gains

    do not appear to change the observation. My BAL_P bias signal at the

    AD8253 REF pin is a well-filtered 2.50V.

    With no input signal on a number of samples, I measure with a Keithley

    2001 DVM anywhere from +20 mV to +50 mV at the U32 AD8253 input pins 1

    and 10. In the Keithley's 2-wire DC current mode measuring from input

    pins to AGND, I measure a similar number of nanoamps, +20-ish to +50-ish

    nanoamps, seemingly confirming the offset voltage is proportional to the

    current times 1e6. Although the AD8253 datasheet specifies Ib and Ios of

    5 nA typical, I find no cases in 12 samples where my in-circuit

    measurement is less than 4-10x this number at room temperature.

    In my AC-coupled IEPE mode where Zin is 1 Mohm, this offset causes a

    baseline error higher than expected and I can't correct it by my usual

    auto-zeroing technique of opening the signal path and grounding the

    input pins momentarily before acquisition. That is the purpose of

    K1/K2/AK4A/AK4D in the circuit, but it provides a low-Z to AGND and

    shunts out the offset current/voltage. (If I instead shunted to AGND via

    1 Mohm to match the IEPE case, it would be hugely wrong for other

    coupling modes where the signal impedance is much smaller e.g. DC

    bridge, thermocouple).

    Although I normally use FET op amps for our Hi-Z front ends, this rugged

    application is space and power constrained so I don't have the luxury.

    Appreciate any suggestions. You folks have been very helpful in the past

    when I've been in a bind.

    Regards,

    Gary

Reply
  • Emman,

    Thanks for the quick response. Attached is my application circuit. It is

    a ruggedized 4-channel 1 MS/s 18-bit DAQ front end that supports

    voltage, DC Bridge, thermocouple and IEPE inputs. I literally evaluated

    every PGA on earth for this app and I am very happy with the size,

    bandwidth, noise and precision. However I am seeing an unexpectedly

    large offset voltage. For testing I have removed the clamp diodes D5/D6,

    solid-state relays K1/K2, analog switches AK4, and shunt cal resistor

    R129, leaving U32 inputs open. I added 1Mohm film resistors directly

    from pin 1 to AGND and pin 10 to AGND to minimize the possibility of PCB

    leakage. Thus the AD8253 U32 is presently seeing only 1Mohm from each

    input to GND and a quarter-inch of open PCB trace. The filtered +/-7V

    rails come from local LTC LTM8022 micromodules, are clean (few mV

    wideband noise) and stiff. I am using a Gain of 1, although other gains

    do not appear to change the observation. My BAL_P bias signal at the

    AD8253 REF pin is a well-filtered 2.50V.

    With no input signal on a number of samples, I measure with a Keithley

    2001 DVM anywhere from +20 mV to +50 mV at the U32 AD8253 input pins 1

    and 10. In the Keithley's 2-wire DC current mode measuring from input

    pins to AGND, I measure a similar number of nanoamps, +20-ish to +50-ish

    nanoamps, seemingly confirming the offset voltage is proportional to the

    current times 1e6. Although the AD8253 datasheet specifies Ib and Ios of

    5 nA typical, I find no cases in 12 samples where my in-circuit

    measurement is less than 4-10x this number at room temperature.

    In my AC-coupled IEPE mode where Zin is 1 Mohm, this offset causes a

    baseline error higher than expected and I can't correct it by my usual

    auto-zeroing technique of opening the signal path and grounding the

    input pins momentarily before acquisition. That is the purpose of

    K1/K2/AK4A/AK4D in the circuit, but it provides a low-Z to AGND and

    shunts out the offset current/voltage. (If I instead shunted to AGND via

    1 Mohm to match the IEPE case, it would be hugely wrong for other

    coupling modes where the signal impedance is much smaller e.g. DC

    bridge, thermocouple).

    Although I normally use FET op amps for our Hi-Z front ends, this rugged

    application is space and power constrained so I don't have the luxury.

    Appreciate any suggestions. You folks have been very helpful in the past

    when I've been in a bind.

    Regards,

    Gary

Children
No Data