I wanted to design a filter for the ADA4622-4 using the "Analog Filter Wizard", but the ADA4622-4 was "deprecated".
Please tell me the reason.
Also, ADA4622-1 / -2 is recommended, can I use ADA4622-1 / -2 instead of ADA4622-4.
Best Regards
ADA4622-4
Recommended for New Designs
The ADA4622-1/ADA4622-2/ADA4622-4 are the next generation of the AD820/AD822/AD824 single-supply, rail-to-rail output (RRO), precision junction field effect...
Datasheet
ADA4622-4 on Analog.com
ADA4622-1
Recommended for New Designs
The ADA4622-1/ADA4622-2/ADA4622-4 are the next generation of the AD820/AD822/AD824 single-supply, rail-to-rail output (RRO), precision junction field effect...
Datasheet
ADA4622-1 on Analog.com
I wanted to design a filter for the ADA4622-4 using the "Analog Filter Wizard", but the ADA4622-4 was "deprecated".
Please tell me the reason.
Also, ADA4622-1 / -2 is recommended, can I use ADA4622-1 / -2 instead of ADA4622-4.
Best Regards
We don't have an eval board for quads.
Also, if you want to see readings 50 dB down or more, you don't want to use quads.
You have this tiny IC and then you are going to put 20!! passives around it and avoid
coupling problems?? For active filters, always use singles and duals for best performance.
Harry
We don't have an eval board for quads.
Also, if you want to see readings 50 dB down or more, you don't want to use quads.
You have this tiny IC and then you are going to put 20!! passives around it and avoid
coupling problems?? For active filters, always use singles and duals for best performance.
Harry